Global Mobility & Immigration Counsel : Immigration Lawyer & Attorney : Littler Mendelson Law Firm : Permanent Residence, Labor Certification : Global Mobility & Immigration Counsel

By Ian MacDonald, Jorge Lopez, Scott Decker and Michelle Valerio

The “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act” (S. 744) was introduced in the Senate early Wednesday morning by the “Gang of Eight,” a group of bi-partisan senators. The bill’s key features include: enhancement of border security and mandatory enrollment in the E-Verify program; legalization and a “pathway to citizenship” for unlawfully present individuals who entered the U.S. before December 31, 2011; and significant expansion of employment-based immigration coupled with elimination of the visa lottery and reduction of family-based immigration options.

The items in the proposed legislation of most importance to employers include:

• All employers would be required to enroll in E-Verify within 5 years.
• The bill would dramatically increase the number of temporary employment options for foreign workers. Specifically, the number of H-1B visas for temporary professional workers would increase from the current 65,000 visas per year (with additional 20,000 set-aside for graduates of U.S. graduate schools) to between 110,000 and 185,000 per year (with additional 25,000 set-aside for graduates from U.S. graduate schools pursuing STEM degrees). Furthermore, spouses of H-1B workers would be eligible for employment authorization, as long as reciprocal employment authorization benefits are afforded to US citizens in the foreign national’s home country. However, the mechanics of the H-1B program would be more difficult than they are now, with the addition of a recruitment requirement for all H-1B labor condition applications with a 30-day posting on a U.S. Department of Labor website, a non-displacement attestation, a change in the way prevailing wages are determined, heightened fees for heavy users of the H-1B program, and additional fees for companies that outsource or lease H-1B workers to third-party companies. Companies would be banned from the FY2014 H-1B cap if more than 75% of their US workforce held H-1B or L-1 visas, from FY2015 if more than 65% of their US workforce held H-1B and L-1 visas, and from FY2016 if 50% of their US workforce held H-1B and L-1 visas.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Suzanne Potter-Padilla

On February 27, 2013, the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security heard testimony regarding improvements made to E-Verify. While committee members acknowledged that E-Verify still suffers from some shortcomings, the message coming out of the hearing was clear that businesses in the U.S. had adapted to using E-Verify and are happy with its results. A representative from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) testified that E-Verify use has expanded to 432,000 employers, compared to only 24,000 in 2007. She also testified that surveys taken of its employer users indicate that the majority are confident in E-Verify’s accuracy and would recommend it to other employers.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Scott Decker

New bills introduced in the House of Representatives will be considered as part of comprehensive immigration reform.

On February 4, 2013, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) introduced three new immigration reform bills in the House of Representatives. The “STEM Jobs Act” (H.R. 459) would eliminate the diversity visa lottery program and would transfer the 55,000 immigrant visas from that program for use by foreign students that have received advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Similar legislation passed the House of Representatives in November 2012. The “Fallen Heroes Family Act” (H.R. 458) would create the “W” non-immigrant visa category status for a foreign national parent or guardian of a U.S. citizen child born outside of the country when the deceased parent was an active-duty service member of the U.S. military. Finally, the “Criminal Alien Accountability Act” (H.R. 457) would impose mandatory minimum sentences on aliens that reenter the United States without authorization after having been removed for committing crimes in the United States.

The same day, Rep. Phil Gingrey, M.D. (R-GA) introduced the “E-Verify Modernization Act of 2013” (H.R. 478). This bill would make the E-Verify Program both permanent and mandatory for all U.S. employers. In addition, the bill would allow employers to wait until receipt of confirmation of the employee's identity and work eligibility before beginning to pay or train the employee, in essence turning E-Verify into a pre-hire screening tool. Finally, employers would be allowed to run current employees through E-Verify, but only if all current employees are screened, thus prohibiting employers from picking and choosing certain employees for additional scrutiny.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Scott Decker

Two immigration reform bills recently introduced in the U.S. Senate will likely be included in the comprehensive immigration reform discussions currently underway in Congress. One is a “carrot,” providing additional visas for foreign investors, and the other is a “stick,” providing enhanced verification of workers’ employment authorization.

On January 30, 2013, Senators Mark Udall (D–CO) and Jeff Flake (R–AZ) announced their intention to reintroduce the bipartisan Startup Visa Act. The proposed bill would create an employment-based immigrant visa for alien entrepreneurs who have received significant capital from investors to establish a business in the United States. Under this proposal, immigrant entrepreneurs and foreign graduates of U.S. universities could apply for a two-year visa on the condition that they secure financing from a qualified U.S. investor and can demonstrate the ability to create U.S. jobs.

On January 31, 2013, Senator Charles Grassley (R–IA) introduced S. 202, the Accountability Through Electronic Verification Act of 2013. This bill proposes to expand the use of E-Verify, a voluntary internet-based system that allows businesses to determine the employment eligibility of their workers by comparing information reported on an employee’s Form I-9 to information in databases maintained by the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration. The Act would make use of the E-Verify program mandatory for all employers, allow employers to use E-Verify before a person is hired, and require employers to check the status of all current employees within 3 years. Moreover, employers would be required to terminate the employment of those found unauthorized to work due to a check through E-Verify.

Additional immigration-related bills are expected to be introduced in the coming weeks, consisting of additional “carrots” and “sticks.”  

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Ilyse Schuman

Update: On September 28, 2012, President Obama signed this bill into law.

On Thursday the House of Representatives approved a bill that reauthorizes for three years the EB-5 Regional Center Program, the E-Verify Program, the Special Immigrant Nonminister Religious Worker Program, and the Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver Program. All four of these programs were slated to expire at the end of this month. The House-approved bill (S. 3245) sets September 30, 2015 as the new expiration date.

As previously discussed, the four programs granted extensions do the following:

• The E-Verify program assists employers in verifying the employment eligibility of its employees.
• The EB-5 Regional Center program is available to immigrant entrepreneurs who invest between $500,000 and $1,000,000 in a U.S. business that creates 10 full-time jobs for American workers. In exchange for job creation the entrepreneurs are given permanent resident status.
• The Special Immigrant Religious Worker program provides a path to permanent residence for religious workers in the United States. The religious workers can hold a professional or non-professional position within their religious vocation.
• The Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver program assists medical doctors studying in the United States on J-1 status. Each state receives 30 J-1 visa waivers for foreign medical graduates each fiscal year. A J-1 visa waiver eliminates the requirement that a J-1 physician return to his or her home country for two years before applying for a permanent U.S. visa

The Senate unanimously approved this measure last month, and it is expected to be signed into law.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Carol Williams

By a unanimous vote, the Senate approved a bill (S. 3245) that would extend four key immigration programs. The bill, which Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) introduced on May 24, 2012, authorizes a three-year extension for the E-Verify program, the EB-5 Regional Center program, the Special Immigrant Religious Worker program and the Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver Program. All four programs are set to expire on September 30, 2012, and the bill would set a new expiration date of September 30, 2015.

•  The E-Verify program assists employers in verifying the employment eligibility of its employees.
• The EB-5 Regional Center program is available to immigrant entrepreneurs who invest between $500,000 and $1,000,000 in a U.S. business that creates 10 full-time jobs for American workers.In exchange for job creation the entrepreneurs are given permanent resident status.
• The Special Immigrant Religious Worker program provides a path to permanent residence for religious workers in the United States. The religious workers can hold a professional or non-professional position within their religious vocation.
• The Conrad State 30 J-1 Visa Waiver program assists medical doctors studying in the United States on J-1 status. Each state receives 30 J-1 visa waivers for foreign medical graduates each fiscal year. A J-1 visa waiver eliminates the requirement that a J-1 physician return to his or her home country for two years before applying for a permanent U.S. visa.

The bill is now pending before the House for consideration.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Reproduced with permission from Law360. Copyright © Portfolio Media, Inc.

By Ian Macdonald

On June 25, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a split decision regarding Arizona’s 2010 immigration law, Senate Bill (SB) 1070. The court made clear that the federal government sets immigration policy and states will not be allowed to preempt federal powers.

States may, however, continue to require businesses to register for and use E-Verify. Recent debate makes it clear that neither U.S. Congress nor states will be allowed to ignore immigration issues.

In its decision, the Supreme Court recognized the challenges that Arizona faces as a result of undocumented workers. The court made it clear, however, that Arizona could not preempt federal law. The court struck down Section 3 of the Arizona law, which made it a crime for an individual to fail to apply for and carry proper immigration documentation showing lawful status.

The court also struck down Section 5, which made it illegal for an undocumented individual to apply for and perform work, and Section 6, which authorized the warrantless arrest of individuals where there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a public offense that makes the person removable from the United States.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Michael J. Lehet

Launched in March 2011, and subsequently available in 21 states plus the District of Columbia, E-Verify Self Check is now accessible in all other states plus Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands. Self Check is available in both English and Spanish.

A part of E-Verify, Self Check allows individuals to confirm their eligibility to work in the United States by entering the same information used by employers in performing E-Verify inquiries (i.e., name, address, date of birth, Social Security Number, citizenship, and identity and work authorization credentials). Self Check compares this information against the same databases utilized by E-Verify to confirm employment eligibility. According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Self Check benefits both workers and businesses, taking the “mystery” out of the employment eligibility verification process and allowing workers to resolve records discrepancies before accepting a new job. Importantly, Self Check is voluntary. Therefore, employers are prohibited from requiring applicants or employees to use the system.

A recent survey found an increase in the percentage of employers using E-Verify to confirm the work authorization of employees. Of those surveyed in 2011, 51% indicated they use E-Verify, as opposed to 28% in 2010.
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Alabama gained notoriety in June when Governor Robert Bentley signed into law HB 56, the Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act. HB 56 quickly gained a reputation as the most aggressive in a long line of state immigration legislation and attracted interest (and ire) from the federal government, immigrant rights groups, and others. A recent federal court decision has halted implementation of certain provisions of the Act, but the central requirement that employers use E-Verify remains intact and on schedule. To learn more about the decision, the E-Verify requirements, and their implications for employers, please continue reading Littler's ASAP, Despite Legal Challenge, Effective Date Approaches for Key Provisions of Alabama Immigration Legislation, by Jorge Lopez and Patrick Simpson.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Kelly Reese

On September 28, 2011, the District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Judge Sharon Blackburn) issued a ruling (pdf) on a motion for preliminary injunction in the lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against the State of Alabama challenging its recently enacted immigration law, House Bill 56 (HB 56).

The court has granted a preliminary injunction enjoining the enforcement of two provisions of HB 56 which are of direct concern for employers. The first is Section 16, which prohibits employers from deducting as business expenses wages or compensation paid to an unauthorized alien and imposes a penalty of 10 times the claimed deduction. The second is Section 17, which creates a new cause of action making it a discriminatory practice for employers to knowingly fail to hire a job applicant or discharge an employee who is either a U.S. citizen or authorized alien while retaining or hiring an individual the employer knows, or reasonably should know, is an unauthorized alien. Employers violating this provision can be subject to a civil suit, and the prevailing party may recover compensatory damages and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

HireRight, an international employment screening provider, recently released its 2011 Employment Screening Benchmarking Report (available here). The report, in part, examines employer use of E-Verify, the federal electronic employee verification system. Of the 1,800 human resources, talent management, recruiting, security, safety and compliance professionals surveyed, 51% indicated that they use E-Verify, as compared to 28% in the 2010 report.

Other findings in the 2011 report include:

• 11% of those surveyed reported that although they are not currently using E-Verify, they plan to use it in the future.
• 60% of respondents store Form I-9s exclusively in paper form, 12% digitally store, and 27% use a combination of both. According to HireRight, employers using a paper-based I-9 process are more likely to experience errors, thereby increasing the risk of noncompliance.
• 69% of respondents reported feeling completely or very prepared for a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Notice of Inspection or audit.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported by the Wall Street Journal, the Legal Workforce Act (H.R. 2885) (pdf), which would require that employers use E-Verify to authenticate individuals’ legal work status, has produced one of the more unusual opposition coalitions, given the current political climate: conservative, tea-party, libertarian and liberal groups all oppose the measure. The groups have voiced their opposition in letters to lawmakers, and one group took an ad out on Politico, a multimedia news outlet covering politics.

On September 21, 2011, the House Judiciary Committee approved the bill, which was sponsored by Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX). Rep. Smith had previously called on President Obama to include a similar provision in the American Jobs Act.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On September 6, 2011, the California State Senate passed Assembly Bill 1236 (AB 1236), the Employment Acceleration Act of 2011, which now heads to Governor Jerry Brown. The Act
prohibits the state, counties, cities and special districts from mandating that employers use an electronic employment verification program (such as E-Verify), except when required by federal law or as a condition of receiving federal funds. The Act’s prohibition on mandating use of an electronic employment verification program specifically applies in the following circumstances:

• as a condition of receiving a California government contract;
• as a condition of applying for or maintaining a business license; or
• as a penalty for violating licensing or other similar laws.

The findings and declarations set forth in AB 1236 include, among others:

• E-Verify’s inaccuracies have prevented employers from hiring employees “in a timely manner;”
• had E-Verify been mandatory in 2010 it would have cost employers $2.7 billion; and
• the net societal cost of all federal contractors using E-Verify would be $10 billion per year, according to a U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimate.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Representative Lamar Smith (R–TX) has called on President Obama to include in the American Jobs Act a provision mandating that employers use E-Verify, the electronic employment authorization program. Responding to Obama’s September 8, 2011, jobs speech, Smith stated: “[I]f President Obama is indeed focused on putting 23 million unemployed or underemployed Americans back to work, there is one element that is missing from his jobs plan: a federal E-Verify requirement. This is one of the best options available to put unemployed Americans back to work.” The E-Verify program has been criticized by many, including Obama, for problems with its accuracy.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Throughout September, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will offer free webinars on the following subjects:

• Form I-9: An overview of the process, including step-by-step instructions on completion, retention and storage of Form I-9’s.
• E-Verify Self Check: An overview of the program that allows employees, at no charge, to check their employment eligibility.
• E-Verify: An overview and demonstration of the program, along with examining the enrollment process and employer responsibilities.
• Federal Contractor E-Verify: A general program overview for those awarded a federal contract containing the FAR E-Verify Clause.
• E-Verify for Current Users: A detailed program overview discussing user roles, common mistakes, and case alerts.

Webinar dates and registration links are available on the USCIS website. While some topics are offered multiple times, the webinar on E-Verify for current users is only offered once this month, on September 29. A computer with internet access and a telephone are required for viewing and listening. 

Photo credit: Matthew Bowden

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In March 2011, the Department of Homeland Security launched the E-Verify Self Check Program, a secure web portal that allows an individual to verify his or her work authorization status. When unveiled, the program’s availability was limited to a handful of states. However, as of August 15, 2011, Self Check is available in 21 states, including the nation’s three most populated: California, Texas, and New York. Additionally, Self Check is now available in Spanish.

Self Check, which is a free service, allows individuals to compare their information to the same databases that E-Verify accesses, giving them the chance to address any existing data mismatches before they are hired by an employer that participates in E-Verify. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services will continue to evaluate and improve Self Check, which it intends to expand nationwide by spring 2012.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

During a recent White House press conference, President Obama was asked whether he would veto a mandatory E-Verify bill that did not include immigration reform provisions. Without directly answering the question, Obama stated, “We may not be able to get everything that I would like to see in a package, but we have to have a balanced package.” Though Obama acknowledged that the E-Verify employment authorization system can be “an important [immigration] enforcement tool,” he added a caveat – “if it’s not riddled with errors.”

Skepticism surrounding E-Verify’s accuracy is not new. The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services have been gradually making improvements to the E-Verify system, many of which are intended to improve its accuracy rate.

The need to attain an acceptable level of accuracy grows as the number of E-Verify users expands. Computerworld reports that more than 250,000 U.S. employers have already signed up for E-Verify, with another 1,300 new businesses enrolling each week. State and local legislation mandating E-Verify use is continually rising. Additionally, in June 2011 two bills were introduced in Congress that would require all employers to use E-Verify. 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Building on changes made in June 2010 to enhance the E-Verify web interface’s usability, security, accuracy and efficiency, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently announced further improvements, including:

• the ability to verify applicants’ driver’s license information;
• less strict entry requirements for U.S. passport and visa number information;
• improved messages that guide employers towards creating qualifying passwords;
• upgrades to the user registration process concerning additional users;
• the ability to select a future hire date;
• a “help” icon linking to instructions and information;
• an upgraded “case details” screen, making it easier to locate detailed case information;
• interface enhancements, e.g., sorting client companies alphabetically, to increase the efficiency of the case creation process for E-Verify employer agent users.

An employer’s existing user ID and password remain valid, and all pre-update case information will be available upon login. However, upon the first login to the enhanced website, users will be required to take a short tutorial to learn about the changes.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported by Politico.com, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recently notified 1,000 companies in 50 states that they will be subject to an immigration audit wherein ICE inspects employers’ hiring records, e.g., Form I-9s and supporting documents. This latest round of notices brings the tally to more than 2,300 audits to date in Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 (October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011), compared to a total of 2,196 during FY 2010.

Audits have been a central theme of the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement strategy. Immigration officials’ focus has shifted to employer, versus employee, noncompliance, the rationale being that the volume of illegal immigration will decrease if employers stop hiring undocumented workers. To prevent such hiring, enforcement agencies use their ability to impose civil and criminal penalties on employers.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The same day a mandatory E-Verify bill was introduced in the House of Representatives, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) introduced the Accountability Through Electronic Verification Act (S. 1196) in the Senate. Like the House employment immigration bill, the Senate version would require all employers to use the E-Verify electronic employment verification system, increase employer penalties for violations of immigration law, and eliminate the current Form I-9 process. The Senate bill, however, would also require a shorter implementation timeframe for using E-Verify and expand its use, among other differences. To learn more about the bills and their implications for employers, please continue reading at Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Alabama is now the most recent state to require all employers to enroll in and verify employment eligibility through E-Verify. This requirement goes into effect on April 1, 2012. The new law prohibits all Alabama employers, public and private, from knowingly employing unauthorized aliens. Additionally, the law prohibits state government entities from awarding contracts or providing grants or other incentives to employers that fail to enroll in and verify employment eligibility through E-Verify. This provision goes into effect on January 1, 2012. Violations of the law can result in significant penalties for employers. The new law also creates a state law cause of action for U.S. citizens and authorized aliens against employers that refuse to hire or that discharge them while knowingly or negligently employing unauthorized aliens. To learn more about the new law and its implications for employers, please continue reading Littler's ASAP Alabama Is Latest State to Enact E-Verify Requirement by Kelly Reese.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A bill that would expand the E-Verify employment verification system and require its use by all employers was reintroduced in the House on May 26. Introduced by Rep. Health Shuler (D-NC) and cosponsored by 37 others, the bipartisan Secure America through Verification and Enforcement (SAVE) Act (H.R. 2000) would create a four-year phase-in period during which all employers would eventually be required to use E-Verify to check the employment eligibility of their potential and current hires. To learn more about the bill and its implications for employers, please continue reading at Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Supreme Court has held that an Arizona law that imposes sanctions on employers that hire unauthorized workers and requires the mandatory use of E-Verify is not preempted by federal law, and therefore valid. The Arizona law at issue – the Legal Arizona Workers Act – provides for the suspension or revocation of an employer’s business license in that state if that employer knowingly or intentionally hires an unauthorized worker. The statute also mandates the use of the E-Verify electronic verification system to check on an employee’s work eligibility. The Court’s decision in Chamber Of Commerce v. Whiting upholding this statute opens the door for other states to enact laws that similarly impose stricter penalties on employers for immigration law violations. To learn more about the decision, please continue reading at Littler's D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

Photo credit: MBPhoto, Inc.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A recent report by Reuters highlights the possible correlation between the demand for pilfered identities and employers’ increased efforts to verify employees’ immigration status, e.g., by using E-Verify. Starting in 2009, federal immigration enforcement efforts have targeted employers rather than workers, and many businesses have been intensifying their efforts to ensure the legality of their workforce. The E-Verify program identifies mismatched names and Social Security numbers but is not designed to flag stolen identities. Accordingly, some undocumented workers have moved away from using their real name and an illegitimate Social Security number and, instead, are purchasing and using stolen names and their accompanying Social Security numbers.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Georgia Governor Nathan Deal has signed into law House Bill 87 (pdf), a sweeping, Arizona-style immigration enforcement bill that, among other provisions, requires employers to use E-Verify, the federal electronic employment authorization program. Provisions of the “Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011” affecting private employers amend the Georgia Code as follows:

• Private employers must register with and use E-Verify to confirm new hires’ legal work status under the following deadlines:
  • Employers with 500 or more employees must comply by January 1, 2012.
  • Employers with more than 100 but less than 500 employees must comply by July 1, 2012.
  • Employers with more than 10 but less than 100 employees must comply by July 1, 2013.
• Business licenses, occupational tax certifications, and other documents required to operate a business will not be issued until the employer submits an affidavit attesting that it utilizes E-Verify or is exempt from the requirement (because it employs fewer than 11 employees or otherwise does not fall within the statute’s requirements). The Georgia Attorney General’s Office will provide a form affidavit for this purpose.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Florida House of Representatives’ Economic Affairs Committee recently approved a bill, HB 7089, that would require all employers in the state to use E-Verify to authenticate newly hired employees’ legal work status. The bill does not require employers to verify current employees’ status.

The proposed law would prohibit an employer from “knowingly” employing an unauthorized alien, and violators would be subject to administrative investigation and possibly administrative and civil actions and penalties. Additionally, a business failing to use E-Verify would lose its business license until it registers to use E-Verify and provides the appropriate licensing agency an affidavit demonstrating such registration. Noncompliant government contractors would have their contracts rescinded and become ineligible for future public contracts.

As reported in The News-Press, the bill faces opposition on many fronts, including labor and business groups. Representatives of Florida’s agriculture and tourism industries contest E-Verify’s efficiency and contend that the bill would damage these industries. Additionally, immigrants staged a pray-in during the Economic Affairs Committee hearing. 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

By Neil M. Alexander and Michael J. Lehet

In our July 2010 ASAP Update, Littler discussed the federal district court decision temporarily enjoining enforcement of certain provisions of Arizona's controversial "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" ("SB 1070"). On April 11, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming the district court ruling.

Like the district court decision, the Ninth Circuit opinion does not impact those provisions of SB 1070 that amend the Legal Arizona Workers Act (LAWA). Consequently, LAWA will continue to provide an entrapment defense to employers charged with knowingly or intentionally hiring undocumented workers. LAWA will also continue to require that employers keep a record of each E-Verify verification. Furthermore, the Ninth Circuit opinion does not affect the language of SB 1070 making it a Class 1 Misdemeanor for occupants of a motor vehicle stopped on a street, roadway, or highway, to hire and pick up, or attempt to hire and pick up, passengers for work at a different location, if the motor vehicle blocks or impedes the normal movement of traffic.

The opinion is the second Ninth Circuit decision to weigh in on Arizona's recent immigration debate. As explained in our September 2008 ASAP, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Legal Arizona Workers Act, the court previously sided with the district court and ruled that LAWA was constitutional. That decision is currently on review before the U.S. Supreme Court. A ruling from the high court is expected within the next several months.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On March 3, 2011, the Georgia House of Representatives passed, by a 113-54 vote, House Bill 87 (pdf), an immigration enforcement bill that, among other provisions, would require employers to use E-Verify to authenticate their new hires’ legal work status. The bill, known as the Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011, now moves to the Senate, where a committee endorsed a similar measure on March 2. As reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, HB 87’s controversial provisions, such as authorizing state and local police to verify the immigration status of certain criminal suspects, prompted “hundreds” of demonstrators to gather outside the Georgia Capitol during the House debate to “denounce the measure as an ‘Arizona copycat law.’”

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Arizona legislators continue to press forward with immigration-related proposals. State Senate President Russell Pearce, sponsor of the infamous SB 1070, recently introduced SB 1611 (pdf), a wide-ranging immigration enforcement bill. On February 22, 2011, the State Senate Appropriations Committee approved the bill by a 7-6 vote, with two committee Republicans voting against the bill, according to Courthouse News Service.

Of interest to employers is Section 9 of SB 1611, which would amend Arizona’s E-Verify statute. Since December 31, 2007, Arizona employers have been required to use E-Verify to authenticate new hires’ legal work status (Ariz. Rev. Stat § 23-214). SB 1611 amends that statute to permit business license suspension for failure to provide proof that the entity is registered with, and participating in, the E-Verify program. If the state attorney general discovers noncompliance, notice will be issued to the business, which will have six months to comply. If, after six months, the business remains noncompliant, the attorney general can petition a state court to order the appropriate agencies to suspend all licenses held by the business. The suspension will remain in effect until the business complies.

The bill’s other enforcement provisions include:

• making it a crime (punishable by a 30-day minimum jail sentence) to drive a motor vehicle while in the country illegally;
• requiring schools to collect information on students’ legal status and to report to law enforcement if families do not provide the necessary documents or if the documents appear false; and
• requiring public agencies to verify renters’ immigration status and to evict everyone living in a unit if any person living in that unit is found to be an illegal immigrant.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On February 10, the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement held a hearing, “E-Verify – Preserving Jobs for American Workers,” in which it considered whether to make E-Verify mandatory for all employers. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R–TX ) favors the idea, as does the Subcommittee’s Chairman, Representative Elton Gallegly (R–CA). In introducing his reasons for supporting the expansion of E-Verify electronic employment verification program, Representative Smith stated: “With unemployment over 9% now for 21 months, jobs are scarce and families are worried. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, seven million people are working in the U.S. illegally. These jobs should go to legal workers.”

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has announced that, on March 18, 2011, it will launch the E-Verify Self Check Program, a secure web portal that allows an individual to verify his or her work authorization status. Previously, only employers could conduct E-Verify checks, and, in the event of a possible mismatch, the prospective employee needed to resolve the matter, thereby delaying his or her possible hire and/or start date. The Self Check Program will allow individuals to correct any identity information errors that the E-Verify system might contain, thereby “provid[ing] a vehicle for an individual to proactively check work authorization status prior to the employer conducting the E-Verify inquiry.”

The Self Check program is a two-stage process: Stage 1 requires users to verify their identities; Stage 2 examines whether the individual is legally authorized to work in the United States.
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Florida recently became the 14th state to require government employers and contractors to use E-Verify to confirm employees’ legal work status. On his first day in office, January 4, 2011, Governor Rick Scott signed Executive Order Number 11-02, which took effect immediately and requires:

• all state agencies under the direction of the governor to verify employment eligibility of all current and prospective employees through E-Verify; and
• that such agencies’ contracts contain an express requirement that contractors use E-Verify to confirm the legal work status of: (1) their employees on public works projects in Florida; and (2) all persons, including subcontractors, assigned by the contractor to work on those projects.

Additionally, the order states that agencies not under the direction of the governor are “encouraged” to use E-Verify to verify current and prospective employees’ legal work status, and to require the same of those agencies’ contractors and subcontractors.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Fresno Bee reports that some employers, particularly within the agriculture industry, will not use E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, to authenticate new hires’ legal work status. Relying on figures provided by the federal government, the paper states that “[o]ut of thousands of businesses in Fresno, for example, only 179 use the program… although those numbers don't account for businesses that contract with personnel companies using the program.” Businesses cite two main reasons for their non-participation in E-Verify: (1) administrative burden; and (2) a shortage of available legal workers.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Proposed legislation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey would impose stricter work authorization verification requirements on employers.

Pennsylvania

House Bill 1502 would require all contractors and subcontractors on public works projects to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. In June 2010, this bill was referred to the House State Government Committee.

House Bill 1503 would require all construction industry employers to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. This bill was passed by the House in June 2010 and is currently in the Senate Labor and Industry Committee.

Employers that in good faith rely on federal programs (E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service) to verify new employees’ legal work status and existing employees’ Social Security numbers will be immune from sanctions. However, employers face debarment from public work contracts (HB 1502) or license forfeiture (HB 1503) for noncompliance. Additionally, employers could face civil liability for retaliating against employees who complain about alleged violations or participate in investigations, hearing or inquiries concerning alleged violations.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Employers using E-Verify to authenticate employees’ work authorization status are subject to the Three-Day Rule, which requires an employer to create an E-Verify case no later than three business days after an employee first works for pay (commonly referred to as the Hire Date). Confusion sometimes arises, however, because the Hire Date differs depending on whether the E-Verify case is created before or after the first day an employee works for pay. To clarify the matter, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) created a webpage explaining how to determine the Hire Date, and how to calculate the compliance deadline.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

According to the Salt Lake Tribune, since the July 1, 2010, effective date of a Utah law requiring businesses with 15 or more employees to verify new hires’ work status through E-Verify, less than one-third have done so. The figure did not surprise Utah Governor Gary Herbert, who stated that even the law’s sponsor did not expect universal compliance. Some suggest that employers either do not know about the new requirement to use the federal electronic employment verification system, or are not hiring due to poor economic conditions, which could explain the low enrollment numbers.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will be implementing additional requirements for employers who register for the E-Verify electronic employment verification system, in order to provide additional protection for employees’ personal information. Previously, registering employers provided E-Verify with their business name, business address, mailing address, phone number and other information, which was then compared to information already in E-Verify’s system in order to prevent duplicate registrations. Now, according to the DHS’s June 2010 Privacy Impact Assessment Update (pdf), employers wishing to register for E-Verify will be required to provide the following additional information:

• the employer’s “doing business as” (DBA) name (if applicable);
• the employer’s DUNS number (the Dun and Bradstreet identifier) (if applicable);
• the name of the employer’s administrator; and
• the name of the employer’s parent organization (if applicable).

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced the June 13 launch of a newly-designed E-Verify website. Highlights of the redesign include:

• icons accompanying case statuses to make it easier to identify cases requiring attention;
• the ability of businesses to view their Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) electronically; and
• simplified terms to better guide users through the process.

Existing users’ IDs and passwords remain valid, and all open cases will be accessible via the new platform. When users log on to the new E-Verify website, they will be required to take a short tutorial about the changes.

E-Verify is an electronic employment verification system, operated by the U.S. government, allowing employers to verify that individuals are legally permitted to live and work in the United States.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

With many in the nation watching, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed the "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" ("SB 1070") into law. The legislation represents Arizona's latest effort to combat illegal immigration and is now the centerpiece of a national political firestorm, including criticism from President Obama and numerous public interest groups. In addition, SB 1070 already is the subject of two federal lawsuits challenging its constitutionality. Lost among this debate, however, are those provisions of the law directed toward Arizona employers. To learn more about the law and its implications for employers, please continue reading Littler's ASAP What Arizona's Controversial Immigration Law Means for Employers by Neil M. Alexander and Michael J. Lehet.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The city council of Santa Maria, California approved a measure to use E-Verify when it hires new employees, reports the Santa Maria Times. The city will commence a six-month trial of the federal electronic employee verification system on May 8, 2010. It is uncertain, however, how often the city will use E-Verify because it is currently furloughing employees to save money.

Some officials and residents supported mandating E-Verify for private businesses as well. However, full council support was lacking, and many community organizers and residents spoke against the proposal.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Coastal Steel and Acoustics became the first company in South Carolina to sign an IMAGE agreement (Immigration and Customs Enforcement Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers), the agency announced. By signing the agreement, the company:

• will receive agency-provided training and education on fraudulent document detection, as well as on proper hiring and anti-discrimination procedures;
• can use E-Verify, the federal electronic employee verification system, and the Social Security Number Verification Service; and
• can become “IMAGE certified” by following the Department of Homeland Security’s Best Employment Practices.

IMAGE was initiated in 2007 to combat unlawful employment and reduce vulnerabilities that help illegal immigrants gain employment in the United States.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division (CRT) announced that the two agencies have collaborated on a series of initiatives to “strengthen the efficiency and accuracy of the E-Verify system.” The first component of this effort is a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) (pdf) that establishes the relationship and process for case referrals between the two agencies with respect to allegations of discrimination arising out of employer use of E-Verify, and information regarding the misuse, abuse, or fraudulent use of E-Verify. The MOA details the agencies’ respective responsibilities, authority, and points of contact, and outlines how future exchange and disclosure of information should occur. According to a fact sheet, on the MOA, the CRT’s Office of Special Counsel for Immigration Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) will receive referrals of potential discrimination that come to USCIS; in turn, USCIS will receive from OSC referrals of potential employer misuse of E-Verify that does not fall within DOJ’s enforcement arena. Moreover, according to the fact sheet, the MOA provides USCIS with a more efficient process to assist the DOJ in pending E-Verify-related investigations.

In addition to the MOA, the agencies have created two training videos that explain E-Verify procedures, policies, employee rights and employer responsibilities in English and Spanish. These videos

“are designed to help employers understand their responsibilities under E-Verify and to inform employees of their rights when working for employers enrolled in E-Verify.”

Finally, the agencies have established an E-Verify employee hotline for employee inquiries, issues and complaints.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

According to the Wall Street Journal, an independent report commissioned by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) found that E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, may be failing to detect 54% of unauthorized workers processed. According to the 338-page report (pdf), E-Verify experienced difficulty confirming that workers’ identities were their own. The purported reason: identity theft.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-TX) introduced the Mortgage E-Verify Act (H.R. 4586), which requires that mortgagors’ legal immigration status be confirmed by E-Verify as a condition for modification of home mortgage loans issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, or insured by the Federal Housing Administration. The bill aims to curb mortgage fraud, particularly by illegal immigrants. Mortgage fraud increased 1,411% from 1997 to 2005, according to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement division.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported by The Washington Times, the Social Security Administration (SSA) failed to run electronic employment verification (E-Verify) checks on 19% of the employees it hired in 2008 and 2009. The SSA, along with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, administers the E-Verify program.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Businesses in the southern California city of Lancaster will be required to use E-Verify to confirm new hires’ eligibility to legally work in the United States, according to the Los Angeles Times. Companies that fail to comply with the requirement could face revocation of their business license. At least 11,000 California business are already enrolled in the E-Verify program, which processed over 8.5 million queries in fiscal year 2009.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Congressman Luis V. Gutierrez (D-IL) has unveiled comprehensive immigration reform legislation that would, among other provisions:

• strengthen border security;
• create a streamlined employment verification system;
• amend the visa program to promote the reunification of families;
• establish a commission to recommend changes to the current system of H-1B and H-2B visas for skilled workers;
• impose tougher penalties for employers who hire illegal workers; and
• legalize undocumented immigrants who register with the federal government, pay a $500 fine, learn English, pass background checks, and meet other requirements. Individuals who meet these requirements would then be eligible for a six-year visa and, finally, a green card.

In unveiling the bill, titled The Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America's Security and Prosperity Act of 2009 (CIR ASAP), Gutierrez was joined by a coalition of lawmakers, including the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Black Caucus, Asian Pacific American Caucus and Progressive Caucus.
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported previously on this blog, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) officially announced the opening of a new Verification Operations Center in Buffalo, NY. This center will employ approximately 135 people with the sole objective of performing immigration status verification for the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) and E-Verify systems. Specifically, the new center will run verification checks of employee work authorization status for companies enrolled in E-Verify, and it will confirm immigration status inquiries for government entities using SAVE. This is the first USCIS field office dedicated to monitoring compliance and ensuring the correct use of the SAVE and E-Verify programs. The Buffalo Verification Operations Center will spearhead USCIS's initiative to stop employers and third-party "investigation" companies from using E-Verify improperly. This development is the government's attempt to improve the integrity of both SAVE and E-Verify. These efforts may also facilitate the reduction of potential discriminatory effect in the application of E-Verify procedures and safeguard privacy interests.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

At a symposium in Washington, D.C., US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that today (November 19, 2009), an additional 1,000 Notices of Inspection (NOI) will be issued. This is a significant move and reveals the administration's intent to increase enforcement actions against employers that engage in the unlawful hiring of undocumented workers. This year alone, Immigration Customs and Enforcement has issued 1,044 NOIs, which is three times as many NOIs than were issued in 2008. Adding another 1,000 NOIs drastically increases this statistic. To further illustrate the administration's aggressive pursuit of employers, Notices of Fines totaling $24 million have been issued in 2009, compared with $2.4 million in 2008. Also, during 2009, 100 companies and individuals have been barred from doing business with the federal government, whereas only one company was barred last year.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On Tuesday the Senate approved by a vote of 79-19 the conference report for the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill (H.R. 2892) that includes provisions extending the E-Verify employment verification system and other visa programs. The House approved the conference report on October 15.  Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

USCIS has released a “Supplemental Guide for Federal Contractors” (PDF) regarding the E-Verify program. The guide contains information concerning:

• applicable regulations;
• instructions on verifying new and existing employees via Form I-9;
• E-Verify enrollment and participation as a federal contractor;
• exemptions and exceptions for qualifying contractors; subcontractors, independent contractors and affiliates;
• enrollment instructions for organizations that qualify for exceptions;
• enrollment instructions for contractors not yet enrolled in E-Verify; and
• instructions for contractors already enrolled in E-Verify.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

With the rejection of an 11th–hour appeal, a Maryland district court judge has permitted the new E-verify requirements for federal contractors to become effective September 8, 2009. Federal agencies are now permitted to require federal contractors to use E-Verify to confirm the work eligibility status of their employees. 

For more information, see Littler's ASAP: Federal Contractors: Be Aware of New E-Verify Requirements in Contracts by Jorge R. Lopez, Joshua Roffman, Aimee Clark Todd and Russell C. Ford. 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported by Daily Journal of Commerce, business groups have appealed the August 25 decision by a federal district court in Maryland upholding the E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule. As previously discussed, the rule is set to take effect on September 8, 2009. If government officials do not voluntarily postpone the effective date, lawyers for the business groups have indicated that they will ask the courts to do so.

Criticisms about E-Verify include:

• the system’s inability to support a large influx of users;
• the complicated nature of the system; and 
• a requirement that contractors who sign up for the system provide the government with access to their books at any time.

Others, however, contend that:

• the system is simple to use;
• an influx of government spending has improved the system; and
• the odds of being audited are probably minimal.

The E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule was created via an executive order by George W. Bush in June 2008 but the effective date was postponed until a new administration was sworn in. The Rule requires contractors receiving federal funds to verify that their employees can legally work in the United States.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Legislation introduced in both the House and Senate aimed at reducing illegal immigration would expand the E-Verify employment verification system, and require its use by all employers. The Secure America through Verification and Enforcement Act (SAVE Act) (H.R. 3308, S. 1505) was originally introduced in 2007, but died in committee. The current bills introduced by Rep. Heath Shuler (D-NC) and Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) remain substantially similar to the earlier versions. Essentially, both bills contain three components to curb illegal immigration, the second of which would impact employers. Both bills would mandate the use of E-Verify, although the Senate bill provides for a slightly longer timeframe in which all employers must be in compliance with the Act. Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A recent USCIS study reports that American businesses authenticate 1 in 4 new hires’ work status using E-Verify. According to a Homeland Security Insight & Analysis article, in 2009 there have been about 6 million E-Verify queries, a considerable increase from previous years. E-Verify boasts a 96.9% accuracy rate, and the program is frequently analyzed and updated. Substantial improvements are scheduled to occur in August 2009.

Although E-Verify has been praised by many in the business community, caution over mandating usage among all employers, particularly smaller employers, has been expressed. Others, however, believe that the system represents an efficient and effective way to curb illegal immigration, and are hoping that Congress increases funding and expands the program.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Yesterday, the Senate approved by voice vote an amendment (S. AMDT. 1371) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations bill (H.R. 2892) that would make the E-Verify program permanent. Currently a voluntary initiative, E-Verify is an Internet based system operated by DHS in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA) that allows employers to electronically verify the employment eligibility of potential and current employees. The amendment – introduced by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) – requires that all government contractors who do work for the federal government use E-Verify to screen their potential hires. Following introduction of the amendment, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) criticized the E-Verify program, saying that it is a flawed system that “creates havoc for both employers and employees.” Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano has announced that the Obama administration will fully implement the federal contractor rule that extends use of the E-Verify system to covered federal contractors and subcontractors, including those who receive American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds. Starting on September 8, 2009, the rule will apply to federal solicitations and contract awards government-wide. At the same time, Napolitano announced that DHS intends to rescind the Social Security No-Match Rule.

In making the announcement, Napolitano commented: “E-Verify is a smart, simple and effective tool that reflects our continued commitment to working with employers to maintain a legal workforce. . . . As Senator Schumer and others have recognized, we need to continue to work to improve E-Verify, and we will.” Initiatives now underway with respect to E-Verify are designed to:

• further improve federal database accuracy;
• add new tools to prevent fraud, misuse, and discrimination;
• strengthen training, monitoring, and compliance; and
• enhance privacy protections.

As reported by The New York Times, support for the E-Verify system is by no means universal. Immigrant advocacy groups continue to criticize E-Verify, and the system is being challenged in federal court by the US Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, who contend that the databases it relies upon is full of errors.

Regarding the 2007 No-Match Rule, which was blocked by court order shortly after issuance and has never taken effect, DHS will propose a new regulation that will rescind the rule. With respect to rescission of the No-Match Rule, the DHS announcement noted that the E-Verify system addresses data inaccuracies more quickly and “provides a more robust tool for identifying unauthorized individuals and combating illegal employment.”

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, has strongly criticized the E-Verify system and proposes replacing it with a biometric-based federal employment verification system. As reported by Workforce Management, Schumer has called E-Verify “unfair” because it singles out individuals with Hispanic surnames and “ineffective” because unauthorized workers can slip through the system by using stolen Social Security numbers and fake IDs.

However, it is far from certain that Schumer’s plan to scrap E-Verify will succeed. The House recently approved a homeland security appropriations bill that includes a two-year reauthorization of E-Verify, and it also has approved redirecting $50 million of the DHS budget to the U.S. Customs and Immigration Services for E-Verify enhancements.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A bill introduced by Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) would extend the E-Verify program through September 2014. The Employee Verification Amendment Act of 2009 (H.R. 2679) would also order a General Accounting Office (GAO) study to determine the cause of errors made by this employment verification system, and its effects on small businesses.  Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The federal government has told a Maryland judge that it plans to delay for the fourth time the effective date of a rule requiring certain federal contractors and subcontractors to use the E-Verify program.  Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported in The Los Angeles Times, the E-Verify program recently received a few boosts, with the Obama administration announcing that it wants Congress to allocate an additional $12 million to the program in the next fiscal year (bringing its budget to $112 million) and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano stating in a congressional hearing that E-Verify was "a cornerstone of workplace enforcement across the country." Almost 125,000 businesses are signed up for the E-Verify program. Some argue, though, that E-Verify will not solve the issue of illegal immigration and that expansion of the program would only push more undocumented workers underground. Others generally support E-Verify but criticize the program’s accuracy rate. The government reports that E-Verify has a 96% accuracy rate, and Napolitano has stated that the government plans to improve the accuracy of the databases.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Representatives Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) and Sam Johnson (R-TX) have introduced a bill that would establish a mandatory electronic verification system to take the place of E-Verify. As reported at Workforce.com, Giffords and Johnson hope their bill, the New Employee Verification Act, will either be the foundation for employment verification in a broader immigration bill or move through Congress on its own.

The proposed legislation would:

• Require all employers to use either the Electronic Employment Verification System (based on the new-hire system used to enforce child support payments) or the Secure Electronic Employment Verification System (which would authenticate an employee’s identity using biometric information). Data for recently hired employees would be checked against Social Security and Department of Homeland Security databases to determine work eligibility.
• Eliminate the I-9 immigration form.
• Establish civil and criminal penalties for employers that knowingly hire illegal immigrants.
• Establish federal preemption of state laws on employment verification.
• Require that the Social Security database, which has a 4.1% error rate, be cleaned up before the new system takes effect.

Giffords and Johnson have collaborated on the legislation with The HR Initiative for a Legal Workforce, which is led by the Society for Human Resource Management.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

E-Verify is an Internet-based system operated by the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (DHS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA) that allows participating employers to verify electronically the identity and employment eligibility of their newly hired employees, regardless of citizenship. Specifically, the SSA will verify that the name, Social Security number, and date of birth are correct, and the DHS will verify that the employee is in an employment-authorized immigration status.  Continue reading the April 2009 Littler "Insight" publication "A Basic Guide to E-Verify and Related Immigration Compliance: Everything Federal Contractors and Others Need to Know to Comply with E-Verify Requirements," written by Jorge R. Lopez, Joshua S. Roffman, Aimee Clark Todd, Shin-I Lowe and Lisa A. Cottle.
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On April 16, 2009, the U.S. Department of Defense announced that the effective date of the Federal Contractor E-Verify Rule will be delayed until June 30, 2009. To that end, the federal government will include the new E-Verify clause in affected contracts on or after June 30, 2009. The government will also take steps to reach out to affected contractors to bi-laterally modify existing affected contracts on or after that date.

On June 6, 2008, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13465, entitled “Economy and Efficiency in Government Procurement through Compliance with Certain Immigration and Nationality Act Provisions and the Use of an Electronic Employment Eligibility Verification System.” Three days later, the Secretary of Homeland Security designated the E-Verify system as the system to be used by federal contractors to satisfy the Executive Order’s mandate. The final rule requiring certain federal government contractors to use the E-Verify system to confirm their employees’ eligibility to work in the United States was first published by the Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in the Federal Register on November 14, 2008. It was scheduled to go into effect on May 21, 2009.

Notice of the delay until June 30, 2009 is expected to be published in the April 17, 2009 edition of the Federal Register.

This entry was authored by Lisa Cottle.
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported at the DailyRecord.com, Department of Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano, has stated that she supports the E-Verify program and would like to see it extended beyond its current expiration date of September 30, 2009. Napolitano also remarked that the Obama administration has not yet taken a position on whether to require all U.S. employers to use E-Verify.

During her interview with Gannett Washington Bureau, Napolitano referred to her experience with E-Verify while she was governor of Arizona. Napolitano stated:

Some of the arguments that are made about how [E-Verify] works or does not work don’t carry much water with me. I’ve already used it for several years. It works.
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On March 12, 2009, a federal district court in Illinois ruled that a state law prohibiting employers from enrolling in the federal E-Verify program violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. United States v Illinois, CDIll, No 07-3261 (Mar. 12, 2009). The Illinois Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act (Ill. P.A. 95-137), scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2008, amended the Illinois Right to Privacy Act by prohibiting employers in the state from enrolling in the E-Verify program until the Social Security Administration and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) were able to achieve a 99% accuracy rating with regard to making a determination on tentative nonconfirmation notices within three days of issuance.

The DHS sued the State of Illinois to repeal the law saying that it interfered with an employer’s right to participate in the voluntary federal program to verify whether a potential employee has valid U.S. work authorization. The federal district court in Illinois sided with DHS, holding that the law is preempted by the Supremacy Clause. Even though the E-Verify program is not mandatory, the court reasoned that the state law frustrates Congress’ intent to make the program available to all employers. The district court enjoined the State of Illinois from enforcing the law.

This article was written by Jorge R. Lopez, a shareholder in Littler's Miami office.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As a result of anxiety over workplace raids and uncertainty over the future of illegal immigrants in the United States, the E-Verify system is soaring in popularity across the country, growing by 1,000 companies a week, The Boston Globe reported. The number of businesses in the E-Verify system has increased 10-fold since 2006. Leading the trend are Arizona and Mississippi, which have made the system mandatory for all employers, as well as 10 other states that require E-Verify for state agencies and contractors. But use of the system is also growing in states where it is optional, such as California, Texas and Massachusetts.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In a late session yesterday, the Senate voted to approve the $410 billion omnibus appropriations bill (H.R. 1105). The House had approved this measure – which extends the E-Verify and EB-5 investor visa programs until September 30, 2009 – on February 25.  Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On February 26, President Obama unveiled his proposed $3 trillion budget.  As expected, the budget includes increased funding for various agencies tasked with oversight of employers. One highlight of this proposal is funding of $110 million to continue expansion of the E-Verify program. Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Embedded in the massive House Appropriations bill (H.R. 1105) that was approved on Wednesday by a vote of 245-178 are provisions extending the E-Verify and EB-5 investor visa programs until September 30, 2009. Both programs are set to expire on March 6, 2009.  Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported at Workforce.com, Rep. Ken Calvert, R-California, who authored the bill that established E-Verify, was unhappy that a provision requiring companies receiving stimulus funding to sign up for E-Verify did not survive in the $787 billion stimulus package. Representative Calvert stated that “there is no assurance that the jobs created will go to American workers,” and asserted that E-Verify was “stripped out of the bill without discussion or debate.” A separate provision, which would have reauthorized E-Verify, also was excluded from the final stimulus package.

Even though E-Verify did not make it into the stimulus package, Congress is likely to find a way to maintain the program (due to expire on March 6, 2009) until it can be addressed as part of a comprehensive immigration bill.
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Immigration-related bills are being introduced at a rapid pace. While many of these bills are destined to languish in committee, the sheer volume of immigration legislation introduced by both parties barely two months into the new Congress increases the chance that at least one bill will eventually receive real consideration. The latest bill – Electronic Employment Eligibility Verification and Illegal Immigration Control Act (H.R. 1096) – would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to create an electronic employment eligibility verification system and a detailed employment verification process, expand the verification system to apply to previously hired individuals, and increase employer penalties for violations, among other things. Continue reading about this bill on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, signed by President Obama on February 17, imposes limits on the availability of H-1B visas, but the E-Verify amendment proposed in an earlier version of the bill was eliminated from the final version. Continue reading Littler's ASAP, "Besides COBRA: What Does the Stimulus Package Have for Employers," by Ellen N. Sueda, GJ Stillson MacDonnell, Patricia A. Haim, and Chadwick M. Graham.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The nation’s economic troubles have inspired a number of new employment-related bills. One immigration bill seeks to promote hiring Americans by limiting the incentives for illegal aliens to move to the United States to live and work, while another bill would facilitate the hiring of foreign workers under the H-2B guest worker program. Continue reading about these bills on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

USA Today reports that the federal E-Verify system is becoming increasingly popular with states, despite the pitfalls and controversies that surround its use. The problems, identified in a report commissioned by the Homeland Security Department, include the following:

• false preliminary rejections that may result in increased discrimination against foreign-born employees
• improper use of E-Verify to check the status of job applicants
• lack of measures to prevent the use of fraudulent IDs

Janet Napolitano, new head of the Department of Homeland Security and a strong supporter of E-Verify, has ordered a review of the program, due February 20, 2009.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Senate Bill 23, the "Fair and Legal Employment for Coloradans Act," was killed in the Senate Committee on State, Veterans & Military Affairs. The bill, sponsored by Senator David Schultheis (R- Colorado Springs), would have required employers to participate in the federal E-Verify program. On his website, Sen. Schultheis had the following to say about the bill's defeat :

This bill was killed in State Affairs committee on 2/8 by Democrats on a party-line vote."
 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The effective date of the E-Verify federal contractor regulation has been pushed back yet again – it has now been delayed until May 21, 2009. (See our previous blog post for more information about the original compliance deadline). The E-Verify federal contractor rule requires certain federal contractors to use E-Verify to check the work authorization of employees assigned to federal contracts, as well as new hires. Continue reading Littler's ASAP, Effective Date of Federal Contractor E-Verify Regulation Pushed Back to May 2009, by Jorge Lopez, Joshua Roffman and Lisa Cottle.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The federal government has agreed to delay the effective date of the E-Verify federal contractor regulation announced in November until February 20, 2009. The delay raises the question of whether President-elect Obama will add the regulation to his rescission list once he takes office.
 

For more information on this development, see Littler ASAP: Effective Date of E-Verify Federal Contractor Regulation Postponed Until February 20, 2009 by Jorge R. Lopez, Lisa A. Cottle and Joshua S. Roffman.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Arkansas Democrat Gazette reports that Arkansas state representative Bill Sample plans to introduce a bill requiring, in part, verification of Social Security numbers prior to the issuance of employee identification cards. Rep. Sample made the following comments about the bill:

It will establish proper guidelines for the issuance of identification cards and documents. ... We're trying to define who can give out identification cards and what those ID cards would state. We don't want those phony ID cards to go out. ... If you give them an ID card, you're responsible to do a little due diligence and make sure that person is in the state legally.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Wyoming lawmakers are considering immigration legislation that would eventually require all Wyoming employers to participate in E-Verify. Under H.B. 0103, all employers would be required to participate in E-Verify not more than three years after the effective date of the act. 

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Senator Brad Ashford has introduced L.B. 34, the "Nebraska Fair and Legal Employment Act." The bill would, among other things, require all employers to participate in E-Verify by 2011.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

According to an Associated Press pre-session survey, a majority of participating Nebraska state legislators support tough policies on illegal immigration. Measures favored by the lawmakers include requiring employers to use the federal employment verification system, E-Verify. See the complete story in the Columbus Telegram.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Given the current economic crisis and other pressing issues facing the new president, sweeping immigration legislation is unlikely. Immigration policy in general is a contentious topic, so expect more piecemeal legislation as opposed to radical, across-the-board reform, as even in this economy there are areas where the shortages are not meeting our demographic needs, such as healthcare recruitment. Continue reading entry on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law update blog.

• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link