USCIS Issues Guidance on Determining Hire Date for E-Verify Purposes

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services LogoEmployers using E-Verify to authenticate employees’ work authorization status are subject to the Three-Day Rule, which requires an employer to create an E-Verify case no later than three business days after an employee first works for pay (commonly referred to as the Hire Date). Confusion sometimes arises, however, because the Hire Date differs depending on whether the E-Verify case is created before or after the first day an employee works for pay. To clarify the matter, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) created a webpage explaining how to determine the Hire Date, and how to calculate the compliance deadline.

Employers can create an E-Verify case before the individual’s first day of work for pay if the individual has accepted an employment offer and has completed a Form I-9. The Hire Date is the date the E-Verify case is created.

Example: An employee accepts an employment offer and completes a Form I-9 on Thursday, but will not begin work until Monday. The employer creates an E-Verify case on Friday, the day after both conditions were met. Friday is the Hire Date.

Employers can also create an E-Verify case on or after the first day an employee works for pay. However, the employer must create a case no later than the third business day after the employee first works for pay.

Example: A business only operates Monday through Friday. An employee first works for pay on Monday, which is the Hire Date. For Three-Day Rule purposes, the first day is excluded from calculating the compliance deadline. Accordingly, Thursday is the third business day after the Hire Date, and the last day for an employer to create an E-Verify case.

Massachusetts Senate Approves Budget Amendment Containing Immigration-Related Prohibitions

The New York Times reports that the Massachusetts Senate has voted 28 to 10 in favor of an immigration-related amendment (pdf) to the state budget bill that would require state contractors to verify that their workers are legally authorized to live and work in the United States. The proposed law also would penalize contractors violating the law by prohibiting them from doing business with the state. Additionally, the state attorney general’s office would be required to set up a hotline by which people could anonymously report alleged hiring of illegal immigrants, and to investigate such allegations.

ICE Serves 180 Audit Notices on Businesses in Five Southern States

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that it has served Notices of Inspection (NOIs) on 180 businesses in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, and Tennessee. ICE will review these businesses’ hiring records to determine their compliance with federal employment eligibility verification laws. As previously discussed, in 2009 ICE developed a new enforcement strategy that includes significantly increasing the number of forensic audits. In December 2009, 1,000 businesses faced an audit. In July 2009, ICE issued more NOIs in one day—652—than it did in all of 2008.

Audit Reveals E-Verify Errors by the SSA Regarding Its Own New Hires

As reported by The Washington Times, the Social Security Administration (SSA) failed to run electronic employment verification (E-Verify) checks on 19% of the employees it hired in 2008 and 2009. The SSA, along with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, administers the E-Verify program.

The errors came to light during an audit by SSA’s investigator general which revealed that, of the new hires for whom E-Verify was not run, 44 individuals should have been flagged as tentative non-confirmations. The audit also found that 50% of the checks being audited were untimely. E-Verify’s terms of use require that a check be run within three days of an employee’s hiring. 1,874 of the checks were run too early, and 1,784 of the checks were run too late.

United Kingdom: New Identification Cards for British, Swiss and EEA Nationals

The United Kingdom’s Identity and Passport Service (IPS) has introduced two new voluntary identification cards: 

  • a national identification card for British nationals; and
  • an identification card for European Economic Area (EEA) and Swiss nationals.

The national identification card will only be issued to British citizens. Job applicants may present the card to employers for identification and work authorization verification purposes, in lieu of presenting either: (1) a passport, or (2) a birth certificate and a document containing a National Insurance number. Similarly, an identification card issued to EEA and Swiss nationals (and, in extraordinary cases, to British nationals) can be presented in lieu of a job applicant’s national passport or identity card.

However, some EEA nationals from the European Union’s 10 “accession states” have no automatic right to work in the UK and employers must also check whether those applicants:

  • have registered with the Home Office (Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia);
  • have been granted a work authorization (Bulgaria and Romania); or
  • are exempt from the accession regulations’ requirements.

The two IPS-issued cards are not the same as the compulsory identity card for foreign nationals (ICFN), which the UK Border Agency is introducing for a range of categories of migrants from outside the EEA. The ICFN can also be used as evidence of the holder's right (or lack of a right) to work in the UK.

Image credit: Zscout370

Over 1,000 Businesses Face ICE Forensic Audits in December

The Contra Costa Times reports that this month over 1,000 businesses will face forensic audits conducted by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Many businesses, e.g., those involved in the food supply chain, have been targeted because they are connected to public safety and to the United States’ “critical infrastructure.”

An audit involves ICE reviewing a company’s Form I-9s to verify employees’ identities and eligibility to work in the country. In 2008, fines increased by 25%, with the result that first-time offenders face penalties of between $375 to $3,200 for each unauthorized employee. In 2009, ICE has ordered companies to pay $800,000 in fines, more than four times the amount imposed in 2008.

Photo credit: Tom Ventura

USCIS's New Verification Operations Center Aims to Improve Integrity of E-Verify and SAVE Programs

As reported previously on this blog, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) officially announced the opening of a new Verification Operations Center in Buffalo, NY. This center will employ approximately 135 people with the sole objective of performing immigration status verification for the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) and E-Verify systems. Specifically, the new center will run verification checks of employee work authorization status for companies enrolled in E-Verify, and it will confirm immigration status inquiries for government entities using SAVE. This is the first USCIS field office dedicated to monitoring compliance and ensuring the correct use of the SAVE and E-Verify programs. The Buffalo Verification Operations Center will spearhead USCIS's initiative to stop employers and third-party "investigation" companies from using E-Verify improperly. This development is the government's attempt to improve the integrity of both SAVE and E-Verify. These efforts may also facilitate the reduction of potential discriminatory effect in the application of E-Verify procedures and safeguard privacy interests.

USCIS Acting Deputy Director Michael Aytes, who was present at the opening ceremony of the Buffalo center, remarked on the growth of E-Verify and SAVE, stating "participation in the E-Verify and SAVE programs has increased dramatically, particularly in E-Verify with a five-fold increase." On behalf of the administration, he sent a clear message to employers and others that E-Verify and SAVE are here to stay, and that the usage of both programs will be monitored closely to ensure they are being used properly. It is recommended that employers participating in E-Verify check that they are in compliance. Examples of noncompliance with employers' E-Verify obligations include:

  • Enrolling in E-Verify and signing a Memorandum of Understanding, and then failing to run all new employees through the system.
  • Erroneously using the system for pre-screening purposes.
  • Failing to process new employees through E-Verify within the three-day period from start of employment.

Interestingly, the USCIS announcement stated that 170,000 employers in approximately 650,000 worksites are participating in E-Verify, with a 97% automatic confirmation of employment eligibility. USCIS also reported that 300 agencies (including 175 state entities, 30 state DMVs, 64 local agencies, and 28 federal agencies) are now participating in SAVE, with about 11.6 million inquiries run through the system in FY2009.

Enforcement actions are on the rise -- significantly. Employers should seriously assess overall corporate immigration compliance; conduct internal audits of I-9 records; determine the effect immigration compliance will have upon other employment-related considerations (such as wage and hour and labor relations concerns); and, finally, review E-Verify obligations immediately.

This entry was written by Ian Macdonald.

Department of Homeland Security Rescinds "No-Match" Rule

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has published in the Federal Register a final rule rescinding the controversial “no-match” rule. The rule – which has been enjoined by a lawsuit filed in 2007 and therefore never implemented – created safe harbor procedures for employers that receive no-match letters from the Social Security Administration (SSA) or notice of suspect documents letters from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) regarding their employees’ authorization to work in this country. Read the full story on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog.

E-Verify Takes Effect for Federal Contractors

With the rejection of an 11th–hour appeal, a Maryland district court judge has permitted the new E-verify requirements for federal contractors to become effective September 8, 2009. Federal agencies are now permitted to require federal contractors to use E-Verify to confirm the work eligibility status of their employees. 

For more information, see Littler's ASAP: Federal Contractors: Be Aware of New E-Verify Requirements in Contracts by Jorge R. Lopez, Joshua Roffman, Aimee Clark Todd and Russell C. Ford

Appeal Seeks to Invalidate E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule

As reported by Daily Journal of Commerce, business groups have appealed the August 25 decision by a federal district court in Maryland upholding the E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule. As previously discussed, the rule is set to take effect on September 8, 2009. If government officials do not voluntarily postpone the effective date, lawyers for the business groups have indicated that they will ask the courts to do so.

Criticisms about E-Verify include:

  • the system’s inability to support a large influx of users;
  • the complicated nature of the system; and 
  • a requirement that contractors who sign up for the system provide the government with access to their books at any time.

Others, however, contend that:

  • the system is simple to use;
  • an influx of government spending has improved the system; and
  • the odds of being audited are probably minimal.

The E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule was created via an executive order by George W. Bush in June 2008 but the effective date was postponed until a new administration was sworn in. The Rule requires contractors receiving federal funds to verify that their employees can legally work in the United States.

USCIS Extends Expiration Date of I-9 Form

The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced on August 27 that the expiration date of the current version of the I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) form has been extended for three years, until August 31, 2012. This means that employers can use I-9 forms that have a revision date of either February 2, 2009, or August 7, 2009. The revision dates are printed in small type on the bottom right of the I-9 form.

As a reminder, employers generally must, within three business days of the date that a new employee begins working (on the first day of work for short-term employees), obtain a completed I-9 form and review original documents establishing the employee’s identity and authorization to work in the United States.

To obtain Form I-9 and the Handbook for Employers (PDF), visit www.uscis.gov/i-9. Forms may also be ordered by calling the USCIS toll-free forms line at (800) 870-3676. In addition, employers may use photocopies of the I-9 forms.

This entry was written by Patricia Haim.
 

E-Verify Usage Continues to Increase

A recent USCIS study reports that American businesses authenticate 1 in 4 new hires’ work status using E-Verify. According to a Homeland Security Insight & Analysis article, in 2009 there have been about 6 million E-Verify queries, a considerable increase from previous years. E-Verify boasts a 96.9% accuracy rate, and the program is frequently analyzed and updated. Substantial improvements are scheduled to occur in August 2009.

Although E-Verify has been praised by many in the business community, caution over mandating usage among all employers, particularly smaller employers, has been expressed. Others, however, believe that the system represents an efficient and effective way to curb illegal immigration, and are hoping that Congress increases funding and expands the program.


 

Senate Approves Amendment to Appropriations Bill that Prevents DHS from Rescinding "No-Match" Rule

Last week the Senate voted to accept an amendment (S. AMDT. 1375) to the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Appropriations Bill (H.R. 2892) that would prevent the DHS from revoking its “No-Match” Rule. Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

Latest Developments in Employment Verification Enforcement

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has announced that it will begin to investigate workplaces in all 50 states to identify employers who are hiring undocumented workers. Specifically on July 1, 2009, ICE launched a comprehensive audit initiative and issued Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to 652 businesses nationwide. States are also beginning to increase their enforcement efforts so employers should take steps to ensure compliance with both federal and state immigration requirements. Continue reading Littler ASAP "Latest Developments in Employment Verification Enforcement" by Jorge R. Lopez, Chadwick M. Graham and Melissa M. Randall.

Napolitano Announces Plans to Rescind Social Security No-Match Rule and Fully Implement Federal Contractor E-Verify Rule

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano has announced that the Obama administration will fully implement the federal contractor rule that extends use of the E-Verify system to covered federal contractors and subcontractors, including those who receive American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds. Starting on September 8, 2009, the rule will apply to federal solicitations and contract awards government-wide. At the same time, Napolitano announced that DHS intends to rescind the Social Security No-Match Rule.

In making the announcement, Napolitano commented: “E-Verify is a smart, simple and effective tool that reflects our continued commitment to working with employers to maintain a legal workforce. . . . As Senator Schumer and others have recognized, we need to continue to work to improve E-Verify, and we will.” Initiatives now underway with respect to E-Verify are designed to:

  • further improve federal database accuracy;
  • add new tools to prevent fraud, misuse, and discrimination;
  • strengthen training, monitoring, and compliance; and
  • enhance privacy protections.

As reported by The New York Times, support for the E-Verify system is by no means universal. Immigrant advocacy groups continue to criticize E-Verify, and the system is being challenged in federal court by the US Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, who contend that the databases it relies upon is full of errors.

Regarding the 2007 No-Match Rule, which was blocked by court order shortly after issuance and has never taken effect, DHS will propose a new regulation that will rescind the rule. With respect to rescission of the No-Match Rule, the DHS announcement noted that the E-Verify system addresses data inaccuracies more quickly and “provides a more robust tool for identifying unauthorized individuals and combating illegal employment.”

Senator Schumer Wants to Replace E-Verify with Biometric Identity Cards

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, has strongly criticized the E-Verify system and proposes replacing it with a biometric-based federal employment verification system. As reported by Workforce Management, Schumer has called E-Verify “unfair” because it singles out individuals with Hispanic surnames and “ineffective” because unauthorized workers can slip through the system by using stolen Social Security numbers and fake IDs.

However, it is far from certain that Schumer’s plan to scrap E-Verify will succeed. The House recently approved a homeland security appropriations bill that includes a two-year reauthorization of E-Verify, and it also has approved redirecting $50 million of the DHS budget to the U.S. Customs and Immigration Services for E-Verify enhancements.

USCIS Provides Guidance on Form I-9

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that the Employment Eligibility Verification form I-9 (Rev. 02/02/09) currently on the USCIS website will continue to be valid for use beyond June 30, 2009.

USCIS has requested that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the continued use of the current version of Form I-9. While this request is pending, the Form I-9 (Rev. 02/02/09) will not expire.

When the extension is approved, USCIS will update Form I-9. Employers will be able to use either the Form I-9 with the new revision date or the Form I-9 with the 02/02/09 revision date at the bottom of the form. 

Bill Would Extend E-Verify Through September 2014

A bill introduced by Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) would extend the E-Verify program through September 2014. The Employee Verification Amendment Act of 2009 (H.R. 2679) would also order a General Accounting Office (GAO) study to determine the cause of errors made by this employment verification system, and its effects on small businesses.  Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

E-Verify Rule Postponed Until September 8, 2009

The federal government has told a Maryland judge that it plans to delay for the fourth time the effective date of a rule requiring certain federal contractors and subcontractors to use the E-Verify program.  Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog.

USCIS Issues "Handbook for Employers" with Form I-9 for Use on or After April 3, 2009

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has provided the new Form I-9 in its recently published “Handbook for Employers”—with the express caveat that it may only be used on or after April 3, 2009. As discussed in a previous entry, USCIS originally planned to implement the new I-9 on February 2, 2009, but interest group pressure resulted in a last-minute postponement. For more insight into this development, see Littler’s ASAP “USCIS Issues Interim Final Rule on I-9 Employment Verification” by Jorge R. Lopez and Chadwick M. Graham.

DHS Secretary Napolitano Issues Immigration and Border Security Action Directive

On January 30, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano announced a wide-ranging action directive on immigration and border security. The directive requires specific DHS offices and components to “work together and with state and local partners to review and assess the plans and policies” to address:

  • criminal and fugitive aliens;
  • legal immigration benefit backlogs;
  • southbound gun smuggling;
  • cooperation with the National Guard at or near the border;
  • widows and widowers of U.S. citizens whose petitions for the alien spouse’s immigration were denied;
  • immigration detention centers (detention standards); and
  • electronic employee verification.

For each assessment, a final report is due by February 20, 2009.