New Jersey and Pennsylvania Consider Stricter Employment Verification Requirements

Proposed legislation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey would impose stricter work authorization verification requirements on employers.

Pennsylvania

State Flag of PennsylvaniaHouse Bill 1502 would require all contractors and subcontractors on public works projects to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. In June 2010, this bill was referred to the House State Government Committee.

House Bill 1503 would require all construction industry employers to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. This bill was passed by the House in June 2010 and is currently in the Senate Labor and Industry Committee.

Employers that in good faith rely on federal programs (E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service) to verify new employees’ legal work status and existing employees’ Social Security numbers will be immune from sanctions. However, employers face debarment from public work contracts (HB 1502) or license forfeiture (HB 1503) for noncompliance. Additionally, employers could face civil liability for retaliating against employees who complain about alleged violations or participate in investigations, hearing or inquiries concerning alleged violations.

New Jersey

State Flag of New JerseyNew Jersey has also introduced two bills, Senate Bill 1842 and Assembly Bill 2600, which would prohibit the employment of unauthorized workers and require all employers who employ 100 or more employees to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees through E-Verify beginning January 1, 2011; compliance for smaller employers would begin on January 1, 2012.

In New Jersey, a rebuttable presumption that an employer did not intentionally or knowingly employ an unauthorized alien will exist if E-Verify was used for verification purposes. Violations can result in sanctions ranging from $100 to $1,000 and suspension and/or revocation of business licenses, depending on the severity of the offense. The New Jersey legislation, unlike the Pennsylvania bills, contains no retaliation provisions.

S1842 was introduced in May 2010 and referred to the Senate Labor Committee. A2600, also introduced in May 2010, was referred to the Assembly Labor Committee.

Employer Audits

The New Jersey and the Pennsylvania proposals also contain enforcement mechanisms. Under the proposed measures, the Pennsylvania and New Jersey labor departments would conduct employer audits and investigate complaint-based allegations to ensure employer compliance. Given the current climate surrounding immigration, it is not surprising that both states have included audits as an enforcement tool. As we previously discussed on this blog, the centerpiece of the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement strategy is the employer audit and, thus far, federal agencies have doled out considerable fines for non-complying employers.

ICE Has Fined Texas Businesses over $600K Since October

Since October 2009, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has levied over $600,000 in fines against Texas businesses for immigration-related violations ranging from incomplete I-9 records to employment of illegal immigrants, reports the Houston Chronicle. The largest fine ($360,000) imposed on a single business stemmed from an investigation commenced by the Bush administration in 2008. The newspaper’s review of federal records revealed a focus on fining employers rather than arresting undocumented workers, reflecting the Obama administration’s new immigration enforcement strategy that focuses on employer culpability through audits.

Petition Circulating in Washington State Seeks Ballot Spot for Immigration Measure

State Flag of WashingtonWith the July 2, 2010 submission deadline approaching, individuals in Washington are trying to collect 241,153 signatures to place an immigration-related measure on the November ballot, reports the Seattle Times. Employment-related provisions of proposed initiative I-1056 (pdf) include:

  • Requiring all employers, after making an offer of employment, to verify the individual’s eligibility to work in the United States, using programs such as E-Verify.
  • Making it an unlawful employment practice to terminate a U.S. citizen, or a permanent resident applying for naturalization, when an illegal alien is employed at the same job site or in a similar position at a different site.

Since 2006, similar measures have failed to get certified, and the chances for a 2010 measure are slim, given the campaign’s lack of funds and the absence of major party support for the measure.
 

Massachusetts Senate Approves Budget Amendment Containing Immigration-Related Prohibitions

The New York Times reports that the Massachusetts Senate has voted 28 to 10 in favor of an immigration-related amendment (pdf) to the state budget bill that would require state contractors to verify that their workers are legally authorized to live and work in the United States. The proposed law also would penalize contractors violating the law by prohibiting them from doing business with the state. Additionally, the state attorney general’s office would be required to set up a hotline by which people could anonymously report alleged hiring of illegal immigrants, and to investigate such allegations.

Obama Administration Urges Supreme Court Review of "Legal Arizona Workers Act"

U.S. Supreme CourtThe Washington Post reports that acting Solicitor General Neil Katyal has submitted a brief (pdf) on behalf of the Obama administration urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review and invalidate the Legal Arizona Workers Act (LAWA), a 2008 law that imposes sanctions far greater than those prescribed by federal law on employers that hire illegal immigrants (Note: LAWA is a different law than Arizona’s recently enacted and controversial immigration enforcement law.). The petition (pdf) for Supreme Court review was originally filed by a coalition that includes the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, civil libertarians and Latino groups.

The brief presents the administration’s position that federal law preempts this state law, and argues that upholding the law would:

"disrupt a careful balance that Congress struck nearly 25 years ago between two interests of the highest importance: ensuring that employers do not undermine enforcement of immigration laws by hiring unauthorized workers, while also ensuring that employers not discriminate against racial and ethnic minorities legally in the country."

Arizona Governor Signs Controversial Immigration Enforcement Bill

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has signed into law an immigration enforcement bill generally acknowledged to be the “broadest and strictest immigration measure in generations.” The bill has attracted national attention, even drawing strong criticism from President Obama who, according to The Daily Telegraph, has instructed the U.S. Department of Justice to examine the measure’s legality.

Among other provisions, the law:

  • allows police officers to arrest individuals unable to provide documentation demonstrating their legal right to be in the United States;
  • allows police officers to charge illegal immigrants with criminal trespassing;
  • allows state residents to sue Arizona’s local or state officials or agencies if they “adopt[] or implement[] a policy or practice that limits or restricts the enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than the full extent permitted by federal law.”

The law also contains provisions regarding verification of employment authorization. Since December 31, 2007, Arizona employers have been required to use E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, to authenticate employees’ legal work status. The new law amends existing provisions to require employers to retain employee verification records for either the duration of the employee’s employment or at least three years, whichever is longer.

Additionally, the new law establishes an affirmative defense of “entrapment” for employers charged with knowingly or intentionally employing unauthorized aliens. To successfully assert the defense, employers must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that:

  • law enforcement officers or their agents, and not the employer, started the idea of knowingly or intentionally hiring an unauthorized alien;
  • law enforcement officers or their agents urged and induced the employer to knowingly or intentionally hire an unauthorized alien; and
  • the employer was not predisposed to commit the violation before law enforcement officers or their agents urged and induced the employer to commit the violation.

However, an employer will not be deemed “entrapped” if it was predisposed to knowingly or intentionally hire unauthorized aliens and the law enforcement officers or their agents “merely provided the employer with an opportunity to commit the violation.”

South Carolina Company Enters First IMAGE Agreement in State

Coastal Steel and Acoustics became the first company in South Carolina to sign an IMAGE agreement (Immigration and Customs Enforcement Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers), the agency announced. By signing the agreement, the company:

  • will receive agency-provided training and education on fraudulent document detection, as well as on proper hiring and anti-discrimination procedures;
  • can use E-Verify, the federal electronic employee verification system, and the Social Security Number Verification Service; and
  • can become “IMAGE certified” by following the Department of Homeland Security’s Best Employment Practices.

IMAGE was initiated in 2007 to combat unlawful employment and reduce vulnerabilities that help illegal immigrants gain employment in the United States.

Arizona House Advances Strict Immigration Enforcement Bill

The New York Times reports that Arizona legislators have given preliminary approval to legislation that primarily concerns State enforcement of federal immigration laws. H.B. 2632, which is nearly identical to a bill passed in February by the state senate (S.B. 1070), would, among other things, allow police officers to charge illegal immigrants with criminal trespassing based solely on their presence in Arizona. The two bills must now go through reconciliation, which is expected to occur within the next two weeks.

Senators Unveil "Blueprint" for Comprehensive Immigration Reform

Last Thursday, Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) released a framework for comprehensive immigration reform. Although a bill has yet to be introduced, the Senators outlined their “four pillar” reform strategy in a Washington Post opinion column. This plan would include “requiring biometric Social Security cards to ensure that illegal workers cannot get jobs; fulfilling and strengthening our commitments on border security and interior enforcement; creating a process for admitting temporary workers; and implementing a tough but fair path to legalization for those already here.” For more information on this development, please continue reading at Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

House Bill Would Impose Criminal Penalties for Employing Unauthorized Aliens

This week, Rep. Frank Kratovil (D-MD) introduced the “Criminal Penalties for Unauthorized Employment Act of 2010” (H.R. 4627). The bill amends section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1324a(e)(4)(A)) by establishing criminal penalties—and increasing the existing civil penalties—that can be levied against individuals with “hiring authority” who employ unauthorized aliens.

An individual with “hiring authority” is defined as having the “direct authority to
make a decision to hire or to recruit or refer for a fee, an individual for employment.” Should a violation occur, the offender could be subject to the following penalties for each unauthorized alien employed:

Criminal Penalties:

  • First offense: A fine of $2,500 and/or imprisonment up to one year.
  • Second offense: A fine of $5,000 and/or imprisonment up to two years.
  • Third offense: A fine of $10,000 and/or imprisonment up to five years.

Civil Penalties:

  • First offense: A fine of between $1,000-$5,000 (currently $250-$1,000).
  • Second offense: A fine of between $5,000-$10,000 (currently $2,000-$5,000).
  • Third offense: A fine of between $10,000-$20,000 (currently $3,000-$10,000).

The bill has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee.

Proposed Legislation Would Require E-Verify Checks on Some Applicants for Mortgage Modifications

Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-TX) introduced the Mortgage E-Verify Act (H.R. 4586), which requires that mortgagors’ legal immigration status be confirmed by E-Verify as a condition for modification of home mortgage loans issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, or insured by the Federal Housing Administration. The bill aims to curb mortgage fraud, particularly by illegal immigrants. Mortgage fraud increased 1,411% from 1997 to 2005, according to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement division.

United Kingdom: Malaysians May Lose Visa-Free Status

By 2011, Malaysians might be required to obtain a visa in order to enter the United Kingdom, according to The Star Online. Presently, Malaysians may visit the U.K. for up to six months without a visa. However, the U.K. is considering rescinding Malaysia’s visa-free status due to the high number (an estimated 20,000) of Malaysian nationals overstaying and working illegally. If this occurs, Malaysian visa applicants will need to pay a nonrefundable processing fee of 1,200 Ringgits (approximately 350 USD; 220 GBP).

 

Napolitano Reiterates the Need for Comprehensive Immigration Reform Legislation

On December 9, 2009, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano confirmed her stance that immigration enforcement is a necessity and must be achieved in conjunction with comprehensive reform of the United States’ broken immigration system. Secretary Napolitano stated, "We can no longer perpetuate a status quo that is unacceptable for workers, employers, law enforcement, faith leaders, and America as a whole. We must seize this moment to build a truly effective immigration system that deters illegal immigration, provides effective and enduring enforcement tools, protects workers from exploitation and retaliation, and creates a tough but fair path to legalization for the millions of illegal immigrants already here."

This statement, made at a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, reiterates the position of the Obama Administration and its intent to present a proposal for comprehensive immigration reform to Congress in early 2010.

Supreme Court Solicits Administration's Stance on Arizona Law Aimed at Companies that Hire Undocumented Workers

The U.S. Supreme Court has asked the Solicitor General to submit a brief outlining the Obama administration’s stance on an Arizona law that punishes companies for hiring illegal immigrants, the Miami Herald reports. The justices will review this brief before deciding whether to hear a challenge to the law.

The law, enacted in 2006, allows private complaints to be filed against companies. Any company found to have “knowingly or intentionally” hired illegal immigrants can have its business license suspended or revoked.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, along with other corporate, labor and immigrant groups, is challenging the Arizona law, claiming that it interferes with Congress’s ability to set immigration policy. The Immigration Reform and Control Act explicitly preempts state action on immigration, except for regulations regarding business licensing. Although the Arizona law has yet to be executed, opponents argue that enforcement would violate federal law.

A Supreme Court ruling on the case could have a broad impact on immigration legislation: In the first three months of 2009, state and local governments introduced more than 1,000 immigration-related bills, 150 of which are specifically related to employment.

California Legislature Passes Resolution Condemning Federal Immigration Policy

Examiner.com reports that California’s legislature has passed a non-binding resolution condemning federal immigration policies, practices and enforcement. The resolution, drafted by California State Senator Gilbert Cedillo, urges Congress and President Obama to declare a moratorium on immigration policies and practices until comprehensive immigration reform is enacted.

Although the resolution has no legal effect, opponents contend that a moratorium would negatively impact public safety. Anti-immigration advocates assert that the resolution’s sentiment does not represent that of the majority of Californians and that illegal immigrants would benefit from the proposal.

The resolution notes the financial contributions of immigrants (documented as well as undocumented), while criticizing various actions such as employer audits and, particularly, the E-Verify system. 

Napolitano Says Immigration Reform Remains a Priority

The Dallas Morning News reports that Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano remains optimistic that Congress eventually will pass a bipartisan immigration-policy overhaul bill. However, because the White House and Congress are consumed with healthcare legislation, Napolitano could not predict when a bill would be introduced. Nevertheless, she believes the process will be less contentious than previous attempts during the Bush administration.

Napolitano stated that immigration legislation needs to focus on the following:

  • Developing or strengthening penalties for employers that repeatedly hire illegal immigrants;
  • Countering new tactics used by human traffickers and money launderers to exploit the border;
  • Developing programs that allow seasonal workers to enter the U.S. legally; and
  • Updating the visa process so that students with skills needed by the U.S. can remain in the country.

Napolitano expressed her opposition to amnesty, stating that she favors an approach allowing illegal immigrants to pay fines and taxes without incurring criminal liability.

Obama Administration's Immigration Policy Resembles Bush's

The New York Times reports that President Obama’s approach to immigration enforcement has remained similar to that of his predecessor. Employee paperwork audits have been conducted at hundreds of businesses and prosecutions for immigration violations have increased. E-Verify, the federal program that allows employers to check applicants’ work authorization status, has been expanded, as has a cooperative program between federal, state, and local officials that runs immigration checks on individuals booked at certain local jails.

The reliance on holdover policies has upset immigrant and Latino advocates, key supporters of Obama’s election, who believed the new administration would take a different, less harsh approach. Although administration officials state that they have backed away from unpopular mass factory roundups of illegal immigrants, advocates contend that the administration’s continuation of existing programs will result in further ethnic profiling and civil rights violations.

As previously discussed, Democrats are planning to introduce an immigration reform bill sometime this year or in early 2010. Anticipating a legislative battle, influential party members have suggested members alter their language when discussing the issue—e.g., abandoning the term “undocumented” in reference to illegal immigrants—to demonstrate their commitment to preventing illegal immigration and strengthening immigration enforcement.

China: Police in Guangzhou Increase Efforts to Curb Illegal Immigration and Crime

As reported by China Daily, police in the Chinese city of Guangzhou have been closely monitoring residential and business areas inhabited by foreigners, looking for individuals without stay permits or holding fake passports. Concerns over illegal immigration, particularly crimes committed by foreigners, have resulted in police stepping up efforts to curb the practice. Officials from Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court said that one-third of fraud cases between 2002 and 2008 were committed by foreigners.Photo by Vladimir Menkov

The police campaign has caused tension in the city’s African communities, resulting in protests over an unconfirmed death of a Nigerian man during a passport check. Police officials have only confirmed two injuries; one involved a man allegedly involved in illegal money operations who injured himself as he attempted to evade a passport check.

Each year, over one million people enter or exit through the ports of Guangzhou, a major trading hub for foreigners, especially from the Middle East and Africa. A local university estimates that over 20,000 Africans with valid travel documents reside in the area, although the overall number is higher because many do not have visas.

To assist foreigners, the entry and exit administrative authority opened an online service where they can apply for permit extensions. Foreigners traveling or residing in the area should always carry their passports and comply with registration procedures.

Napolitano to Confer with Lawmakers on Full Range of Immigration Issues

President Barack Obama has asked Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to meet regularly with members of Congress in order to systematically resolve various immigration issues, including treatment of the 12 million illegal immigrants currently in the country and prevention of illegal immigration going forward. As reported by Reuters, statements by Obama and by various lawmakers emphasize the urgent need to enact immigration reforms soon.

Following a recent meeting with Republican and Democratic lawmakers, Obama told the press, “Despite our inability to get this passed over the last several years, the American people still want to see a solution.” Also following the meeting, Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) stated that Obama has set a goal of passing legislation by the end of 2009 or early 2010. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) stated that, due to the political heat caused by immigration issues, he sees only “one more chance” to enact legislation:

If we can't get it done this time around, no politician is going to take this up in a generation. That would be a shame for this country.

Support of E-Verify Program Grows, But Critics Remain

As reported in The Los Angeles Times, the E-Verify program recently received a few boosts, with the Obama administration announcing that it wants Congress to allocate an additional $12 million to the program in the next fiscal year (bringing its budget to $112 million) and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano stating in a congressional hearing that E-Verify was "a cornerstone of workplace enforcement across the country." Almost 125,000 businesses are signed up for the E-Verify program. Some argue, though, that E-Verify will not solve the issue of illegal immigration and that expansion of the program would only push more undocumented workers underground. Others generally support E-Verify but criticize the program’s accuracy rate. The government reports that E-Verify has a 96% accuracy rate, and Napolitano has stated that the government plans to improve the accuracy of the databases.

Illegal Immigrant Population Shifting to Different States

As reported at Stateline.org, a new report  finds that the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States are settling in states such as Georgia and North Carolina, where relatively few lived 20 years ago. The findings could have financial implications for already stressed state and local governments.

Highlights of the report, conducted by the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center, include:

  • California leads the nation with 2.7 million illegal immigrants, but its share of the national total has dropped from 42% in 1990 to 22% in 2008. Instead, larger numbers of illegal immigrants are moving to states in the Southeast, Southwest, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest and Mountain regions.
  • Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Texas have retained their appeal to illegal immigrants.
  • The children of illegal immigrants comprise 6.8% of K-12 students in the U.S., up from 5.4% in 2003.
  • Six in 10 illegal immigrants lack health insurance, more than double the uninsured share among legal immigrants and four times the uninsured share among U.S.-born adults.
  • An estimated 8.3 million of the nation’s 154 million people in the labor force are illegal immigrants, according to 2008 estimates. That is a share of about 5.4%, up from 4.3% in 2003.

The Pew Hispanic Center periodically examines trends in the unauthorized immigrant population. State and local officials watch such trends carefully because state and local governments pay for the services provided to illegal immigrants, especially education, health care and public safety.