Bill Would Remove Per-Country Caps on Employment-Based Visas

U.S. Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-UT)Currently, the Immigration and Nationality Act permits the issuance of approximately 140,000 employment-based visas each year. The percentage of available visas that may be awarded to nationals of any one country is capped, i.e., visas issued to individuals of one country cannot exceed 7% of the total number of visas available.

Under the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act (H.R. 3012), introduced by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R–UT), the per-country limitation for employment-based visas would be removed. Additionally, the following transitional rules would apply to employment-based visas:

  • Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 (Oct. 1, 2011-Sept. 30, 2012): 15% of visas would be allocated to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area that was not one of the two countries with the largest numbers of natives obtaining permanent resident status during FY 2010.
  • FY 2013: 10% of visas would be allocated to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area that was not one of the two countries with the largest numbers of natives obtaining permanent resident status during FY 2011.
  • FY 2014: 10% of visas would be allocated to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state or dependent area that was not one of the two countries with the largest numbers of natives obtaining permanent resident status during FY 2012.

Additionally, H.R. 3012 increases, from 7 to 15% of the total number of available visas, the per-country restrictions for family-sponsored immigrants.

The bill has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement.

Bill Would Significantly Increase Employer Penalties for Hiring Illegal Workers

Rep. Sue Wilkins Myrick (R-NC) has reintroduced legislation that would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to substantially increase employer penalties for violations. The 10k Run for the Border Act (H.R. 1698) would increase the fines for knowingly hiring or recruiting an undocumented worker, or continuing to employ an illegal alien when the employee’s legal status changes or becomes known.

Under the terms of this bill, an employer could be fined between $10,000 and $80,000 for each violation, an increase from the current $250-$2,000 penalty range. For an employer with a prior violation, the penalties would be increased to between $80,000 and $200,000, up from $2,000 to $5,000 per violation under current law. For a repeat offender, the fine skyrockets to a range of $120,000 to $1.6 million. The current fine for such a repeat offense is a minimum penalty of $3,000 and a maximum of $10,000.

If state or local law enforcement officials provide material assistance in investigating or prosecuting employers that are in violation of this law, they are entitled to 80 percent of the fines paid by those employers. It follows that such large financial incentives would increase enforcement.

The provisions of this amendment would take effect on the day of enactment. Prior versions of this bill have been introduced within the past six years, but have failed to advance.

Photo credit: Kameleon007

Proposed House Bill Would Restrict Eligibility for Birthright Citizenship

On January 5, four Republican Congressmen, along with 26 co-sponsors, introduced H.R. 140, the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011. This bill would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act’s birthright citizenship requirements (8 U.S.C. § 1401) so that individuals born in the United States will be granted citizenship only if at least one parent is:

  • a U.S. citizen or national;
  • a lawful U.S. permanent resident; or
  • an alien performing active service in the armed forces.

Currently, an individual born on U.S. soil is considered a citizen or national. Rep. Steve King (R–IA), primary sponsor of the Act, claims the bill prevents illegal immigrants from obtaining U.S. immigration benefits by virtue of their U.S.-born children.

The Director of the American Civil Liberties Union Washington Legislative Office contends the bill violates the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which provides that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The bill has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee.
 

USCIS Ombudsman Makes Recommendations Regarding H-1B Filings Stalled by Wrongly Denied Labor Conditions Applications

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Ombudsman has discovered (pdf) that iCert, the certification process for Labor Conditions Applications (LCA) operated by the Department of Labor, has been generating false mismatches of Federal Employer Numbers. After examining applications filed between April and August 2009, the Ombudsman found that 7% of denials (approximately 2,900 applications) were incorrect. These errors can hinder the ability to timely file original or extension H-1B visa petitions.

Currently, USCIS requires that petitioners include a certified LCA with their H-1B petitions, although the controlling statute, the Immigration Nationality Act, does not require this.

To remedy the situation, the Ombudsman made the following recommendations:

  • reinstate USCIS’ previous practice of temporarily accepting an H-1B petition with proof of timely filing of an LCA with DOL, and issue a Request for Evidence requiring the petitioner to later provide the certified LCA; and
  • establish a temporary policy under which USCIS would excuse late H-1B filings where the petitioner has documented an LCA submission to DOL that was improperly rejected.
     

Seventh Circuit Upholds DOL Regulation of Labor Certificates

The United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, has upheld a United States Department of Labor (DOL) regulation amended to limit the validity of foreign worker labor certificates to 180 days after the regulation had taken effect and only if submitted with a visa petition within that time period. A group of businesses had challenged the regulation, arguing that: (1) the DOL exceeded its authority by creating a rule that regulates immigration, and (2) the regulation itself was unlawfully retroactive because it invalidated previously approved labor certificates that were “valid indefinitely.”

The Seventh Circuit held that the DOL had not exceeded its authority, noting that previous DOL policy was not entirely consistent with federal law requiring that labor certificates only be issued if the DOL could demonstrate that (1) there were insufficient numbers of qualified and available workers for the position and (2) the employment of foreign workers would not adversely impact U.S. workers. The amended regulation, however, fulfilled legislative intent by requiring determinations based on true labor market conditions as well as protecting the interests of U.S. workers.

The court further held that the regulation was not retroactive because it did not create new legal consequences for a past act. The court found that the mere act of applying for a labor certificate was not a final event triggering legal consequences. Moreover, the court reasoned that “indefinite” did not mean “permanent” because the duration was “not clearly fixed.” The court concluded that the DOL addressed the issue of “indefiniteness” by prescribing a validity period for labor certificates.

U.S. Rep. Flake Introduces Legislation to Exempt Foreigners Who Earn a Ph.D. in the U.S. from H-1B Visa Cap

On March 30, 2009, U.S. Representative Jeff Flake (R.-AZ) introduced legislation (H.R. 1791) that would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize “certain aliens who have earned a Ph.D. degree from a United States institution of higher education in a field of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics” to be exempted from the numerical caps on H-1B visas. The bill, titled “Stopping Trained in America Ph.D.s From Leaving the Economy Act of 2009” (the “STAPLE Act”), was referred to the House Judiciary Committee. In addition to the exemption from the H-1B numerical cap, the legislation also would exempt the specified foreigners from the numerical limitations on permanent residence.

Another Immigration Bill Increasing Employer Penalties is Introduced

A bill that would amend section 274A(e)(4)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to substantially increase employer penalties for violations was introduced last week by Rep. Sue Wilkins Myrick (R-NC). The 10k Run for the Border Act (H.R. 588) would increase the fines for knowingly hiring or recruiting an undocumented worker, or continuing to employ an illegal alien when the employee’s legal status changes or becomes known. Continue reading entry on Littler's Washington DC Employment Law Update blog.