Global Immigration Counsel : Immigration Lawyer & Attorney : Littler Mendelson Law Firm : Permanent Residence, Labor Certification : Global Immigration Counsel

By Shin-I Lowe

On November 12, 2011, while meeting in Honolulu with Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders, President Obama signed the APEC Business Travel Card (ABTC) Act, which will expedite travel in the Asia-Pacific region for qualified American travelers. Under the Act, U.S. Customs and Border Protection is authorized to issue the ABTC to U.S. citizens as part of its Global Entry program. Cardholders will receive expedited scheduling of visa interviews and access to fast-track immigration lanes at airports in APEC's 21 economies.

The Act, which unanimously passed Congress earlier this month, allows U.S. business people to apply for the cards for reciprocal rights in the region. Cardholders will have pre-cleared immigration entry into the 18 fully participating member economies, eliminating the cost and time involved in obtaining visas. Cardholders also will benefit from expedited transit through special fast-track lanes at major airports and seaports in all 21 economies.

An APEC press release cited business leaders’ praise of the development as a “clear signal” that the United States is helping businesses as they seek stronger trade ties in the Asia-Pacific region.

Photo credit: Official White House Photo by Pete Souza
 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported by the Wall Street Journal, the Legal Workforce Act (H.R. 2885) (pdf), which would require that employers use E-Verify to authenticate individuals’ legal work status, has produced one of the more unusual opposition coalitions, given the current political climate: conservative, tea-party, libertarian and liberal groups all oppose the measure. The groups have voiced their opposition in letters to lawmakers, and one group took an ad out on Politico, a multimedia news outlet covering politics.

On September 21, 2011, the House Judiciary Committee approved the bill, which was sponsored by Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX). Rep. Smith had previously called on President Obama to include a similar provision in the American Jobs Act.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Representative Lamar Smith (R–TX) has called on President Obama to include in the American Jobs Act a provision mandating that employers use E-Verify, the electronic employment authorization program. Responding to Obama’s September 8, 2011, jobs speech, Smith stated: “[I]f President Obama is indeed focused on putting 23 million unemployed or underemployed Americans back to work, there is one element that is missing from his jobs plan: a federal E-Verify requirement. This is one of the best options available to put unemployed Americans back to work.” The E-Verify program has been criticized by many, including Obama, for problems with its accuracy.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On August 16, 2011, President Obama issued a memorandum extending the September 30, 2011 expiration of Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) applicable to Liberians. The memorandum’s effect is to defer for 18 months the removal of any Liberian national, or person without nationality who last habitually resided in Liberia, who is present in the United States and who is under a grant of DED as of September 30, 2011.

Following the President’s action, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced a 6-month extension, through March 31, 2012, of employment authorization for qualifying Liberian nationals covered under DED. Qualifying individuals will be permitted to continue working as they file applications for new Employment Authorization Documents (EADs), which will cover the full 18 months of the DED extension.

Not all Liberians qualify under DED; for example:

• Liberians without Temporary Protected Status (TPS) on Sept. 30, 2007 are not covered under the current DED;
• certain criminals;
• persons subject to the mandatory bars to TPS; and
• other ineligible persons described in President Obama’s memorandum.

USCIS will publish in the Federal Register a notice with instructions on obtaining employment authorization for the remainder of the DED extension.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

During a recent White House press conference, President Obama was asked whether he would veto a mandatory E-Verify bill that did not include immigration reform provisions. Without directly answering the question, Obama stated, “We may not be able to get everything that I would like to see in a package, but we have to have a balanced package.” Though Obama acknowledged that the E-Verify employment authorization system can be “an important [immigration] enforcement tool,” he added a caveat – “if it’s not riddled with errors.”

Skepticism surrounding E-Verify’s accuracy is not new. The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services have been gradually making improvements to the E-Verify system, many of which are intended to improve its accuracy rate.

The need to attain an acceptable level of accuracy grows as the number of E-Verify users expands. Computerworld reports that more than 250,000 U.S. employers have already signed up for E-Verify, with another 1,300 new businesses enrolling each week. State and local legislation mandating E-Verify use is continually rising. Additionally, in June 2011 two bills were introduced in Congress that would require all employers to use E-Verify. 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported by Politico.com, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recently notified 1,000 companies in 50 states that they will be subject to an immigration audit wherein ICE inspects employers’ hiring records, e.g., Form I-9s and supporting documents. This latest round of notices brings the tally to more than 2,300 audits to date in Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 (October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011), compared to a total of 2,196 during FY 2010.

Audits have been a central theme of the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement strategy. Immigration officials’ focus has shifted to employer, versus employee, noncompliance, the rationale being that the volume of illegal immigration will decrease if employers stop hiring undocumented workers. To prevent such hiring, enforcement agencies use their ability to impose civil and criminal penalties on employers.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Immigrant Investor Program (“EB-5 Program”) makes available 10,000 visas annually to immigrant investors who invest in commercial enterprises creating at least 10 full-time jobs for U.S. workers. However, the annual cap has never been met in the two decades since the program’s creation.

In a move designed to maximize utilization of the Immigrant Investor Program and respond to President Obama’s call to promote immigrants’ entrepreneurial spirit, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced proposed enhancements to EB-5 visa processing, consisting of three main elements (pdf):

1. USCIS will accelerate processing for applications involving job-creating projects that are fully developed and ready to be implemented. Applicants and petitioners will have the option to request Premium Processing Service, which, for an additional fee, guarantees processing within 15 calendar days.
2. USCIS will create new intake teams with expertise in economic analysis and EB-5 Program requirements. Moreover, applicants submitting Form I-924 (i.e., applying to participate under a USCIS-designated Regional Center) will be able to directly communicate via email with the team to streamline issue resolution and rapidly address applicants’ questions or needs.
3. USCIS will convene an expert Decision Board, composed of an economist and adjudicators supported by legal counsel, to render an enhanced decision process concerning Form I-924 applications. For example, interviews will be available in instances where the Board’s preliminary recommendation is to request further information or to deny the application.

USCIS will accept public comment on the proposals until June 17, 2011.

Image credit: StudioX

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On April 19, President Obama assembled a bipartisan group of current and former government officials, law enforcement representatives, and business, faith and civic leaders, to gather their input regarding possibilities for immigration reform. A White House press statement about the meeting stated that the President encouraged participants to take a public role and solicit input from their communities about how immigration reform can be achieved.

As reported by CNN, the President remains committed to reform, although he recognizes that progress will not be easy given the politically divided Congress. Even before the Democrats’ losses in the 2010 Congressional election, substantial reform proposals made during President Obama’s term, such as the DREAM Act, have been unsuccessful. USA Today reports that the President favors legislation that would simultaneously increase border security and offer current illegal immigrants a path to citizenship, although some Republican lawmakers contend that this would reward lawbreakers. 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On January 2, 2011, President Obama signed H.R. 847, known as the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010, which provides medical monitoring and treatment for 9/11 first responders. The law will be financed in part by extending the period during which increased application fees for L and H-1B visas will be collected from certain employers. As discussed previously, application fees increased for certain employers by $2,250 (L visas) and $2,000 (H-1B visas) to fund a border protection bill enacted in August 2010. This increase, which was to expire on September 30, 2014, now expires on September 30, 2015.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Despite no significant legislative advances concerning immigration during his first two years in office, and an upcoming legislative session with a Republican majority in the House and increased Republican presence in the Senate, President Obama told the Congressional Hispanic Caucus that he will continue to push for comprehensive immigration reform in 2011, reports Politico. Though the gesture was welcomed by caucus members, it remains uncertain whether Obama will find similar support in his own party given that many new, incoming legislators are veering to the right politically and pushing for more typically conservative initiatives like increased border control and enforcement. The President’s pledge came shortly after the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (DREAM Act), which would have provided six years of conditional permanent residency to certain undocumented minors who have completed high school and then join the military or attend college for at least two years, failed to garner sufficient Senate votes to overcome a Republican filibuster.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

President Obama, along with Senator Robert Menendez (D–NJ) and Representatives Luis Gutierrez (D–IL) and Nydia Velazquez (D–NY), is pushing for a vote this year on the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (DREAM Act), The Wall Street Journal reports. The president has agreed to make calls to Republican lawmakers seeking support for the legislation.

Given the administration’s past lack of success in advancing immigration legislation, coupled with strong opposition from Republicans (some of whom oppose the path to citizenship the Act creates), many doubt whether this effort will gather enough votes to advance the bill. Supporters, however, believe that passage of the Act, compared to comprehensive reform, may be possible.

The DREAM Act (S. 729), which Senator Dick Durbin (D–IL) introduced in March 2009, has remained idle in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Prior Senate votes on bills onto which legislators hoped to attach the DREAM Act have failed. As previously reported here, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unsuccessfully attempted to attach the Act to a defense spending bill on September 21, 2010. One week later, Senators Menendez and Leahy (D–VT) incorporated the Act into their comprehensive immigration reform bill (S. 3932), which, like the DREAM Act, remains in committee.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On September 21, 2010, a cloture motion on the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (S. 3454) fell four votes shy of the 60 required to advance the measure in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–NV) intended to include the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (DREAM Act) (S. 729) as an amendment to the bill. Also included in the defense bill was a provision to repeal the U.S. military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

The DREAM Act is supported by President Obama, various business groups and the AFL-CIO. The Act would provide six years of conditional permanent residency to certain undocumented minors who have completed high school and go on to join the military or attend college for at least two years.

All Republican senators—save for Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), who did not vote—voted against the motion. Two Democrats, Senators Blanche Lincoln (D-NE) and Mark Pryor (D-NV), also cast votes against the motion. As a procedural safeguard, Senator Reid cast a “no” vote in order to retain the right to bring the motion up for vote again.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Senator Jeff Merkley (D–OR), who has been working with Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) on a comprehensive immigration bill, does not expect action on immigration reform this year, according to The Hill. The senator’s statement exemplifies the on-again, off-again relationship that legislators have with immigration reform. Below is a brief recap of comprehensive immigration reform developments so far in 2010:

• February: Although immigration reform was a staple of President Obama’s campaign and early-term rhetoric, his State of the Union Address contained only one sentence on the topic.
• March: Senators Schumer and Lindsey Graham (R–SC) unveiled their “blueprint” for comprehensive reform.
• April: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–NV) predicted that the issue would not be addressed until after Memorial Day.
• June: President Obama urged Republicans to work with Democrats to pass a bill.
• July: In a keynote speech at American University’s School of International Service, President Obama pressed for immigration reform.
• August: A spokesperson for Senator Dick Durbin (D–IL), who introduced the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (the "DREAM Act") (pdf), legislation to help students who immigrated to the U.S. as children obtain citizenship, reportedly said that comprehensive immigration reform is still possible in 2010.

Meanwhile, some state and local governments have attempted to fill the void they believe is created by federal inactivity on immigration reform, with Arizona attracting the most attention.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Proposed legislation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey would impose stricter work authorization verification requirements on employers.

Pennsylvania

House Bill 1502 would require all contractors and subcontractors on public works projects to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. In June 2010, this bill was referred to the House State Government Committee.

House Bill 1503 would require all construction industry employers to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. This bill was passed by the House in June 2010 and is currently in the Senate Labor and Industry Committee.

Employers that in good faith rely on federal programs (E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service) to verify new employees’ legal work status and existing employees’ Social Security numbers will be immune from sanctions. However, employers face debarment from public work contracts (HB 1502) or license forfeiture (HB 1503) for noncompliance. Additionally, employers could face civil liability for retaliating against employees who complain about alleged violations or participate in investigations, hearing or inquiries concerning alleged violations.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Since October 2009, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has levied over $600,000 in fines against Texas businesses for immigration-related violations ranging from incomplete I-9 records to employment of illegal immigrants, reports the Houston Chronicle. The largest fine ($360,000) imposed on a single business stemmed from an investigation commenced by the Bush administration in 2008. The newspaper’s review of federal records revealed a focus on fining employers rather than arresting undocumented workers, reflecting the Obama administration’s new immigration enforcement strategy that focuses on employer culpability through audits.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Audits, not raids, are the centerpiece of the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement strategy, reports the New York Times. In the past year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) audited over 2,900 business to determine whether illegal immigrants were employed, and, in 2010, it imposed $3 million in civil fines. While audits are less visually dramatic than raids, the effects on workers and businesses are not.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Although some contend a comprehensive immigration bill is not probable as midterm elections near, President Obama has urged Republican lawmakers to work with Democrats in passing a law that would create an “orderly, fair, humane immigration framework in which people are able to immigrate to this country in a legal fashion,” reports Reuters. President Obama’s request followed his ordering 1,200 National Guard troops to Arizona’s border with Mexico, which he contends will not alone solve the problem.

The troop deployment was met with mixed reviews. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) contends that a deployment of at least 6,000 troops is necessary. Some view the move as an attempt by the president to show Republicans and centrist Democrats that he is serious about immigration, while certain Latino activists contend that it is merely a political gesture and will only negatively impact their community.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Washington Post reports that acting Solicitor General Neil Katyal has submitted a brief (pdf) on behalf of the Obama administration urging the U.S. Supreme Court to review and invalidate the Legal Arizona Workers Act (LAWA), a 2008 law that imposes sanctions far greater than those prescribed by federal law on employers that hire illegal immigrants (Note: LAWA is a different law than Arizona’s recently enacted and controversial immigration enforcement law.). The petition (pdf) for Supreme Court review was originally filed by a coalition that includes the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, civil libertarians and Latino groups.

The brief presents the administration’s position that federal law preempts this state law, and argues that upholding the law would:

"disrupt a careful balance that Congress struck nearly 25 years ago between two interests of the highest importance: ensuring that employers do not undermine enforcement of immigration laws by hiring unauthorized workers, while also ensuring that employers not discriminate against racial and ethnic minorities legally in the country."

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In his 2010 State of the Union address, President Obama devoted only a single sentence to immigration reform. As reported by The Washington Post, this cursory treatment of the issue has led to “disillusionment” among immigration advocates. A staple of Obama’s campaign and early-term rhetoric, immigration reform has taken a back seat to health care reform and other issues, such as job creation.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On December 9, 2009, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano confirmed her stance that immigration enforcement is a necessity and must be achieved in conjunction with comprehensive reform of the United States’ broken immigration system. Secretary Napolitano stated, "We can no longer perpetuate a status quo that is unacceptable for workers, employers, law enforcement, faith leaders, and America as a whole. We must seize this moment to build a truly effective immigration system that deters illegal immigration, provides effective and enduring enforcement tools, protects workers from exploitation and retaliation, and creates a tough but fair path to legalization for the millions of illegal immigrants already here."

This statement, made at a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, reiterates the position of the Obama Administration and its intent to present a proposal for comprehensive immigration reform to Congress in early 2010.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Limited slots at Chinese universities and the prestige of U.S. higher education are contributing to an influx of Chinese nationals to American colleges and universities, according to USA Today. An Institute of International Education report found that, compared with last year, enrollment by Chinese nationals has increased 21% to 98,510 undergraduate and graduate students, slightly behind India, which sends 103,260 students.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Houston Chronicle reports that with a budget shortfall of $164 million, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is considering increasing the fees it charges for immigration applications. USCIS also is considering possible cost-saving measures, including staff layoffs. As this blog previously noted, immigration applications (e.g., citizenship, permanent residency), a revenue source for USCIS, have decreased in recent years, thereby straining USCIS’s budget. In fiscal year 2009, citizenship applications decreased by over 25% (1 million in FY 2008; 733,000 in FY 2009). Although USCIS improved its citizenship application processing time after the most recent fee increases (July 2007), it may experience difficulty maintaining the five-month average processing time if the Obama administration succeeds in implementing a legalization program for the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

As reported by the New York Times, on October 30, 2009, President Obama repealed the ban on travel to the United States by people who test positive for HIV. The final rule (pdf) lifting the ban will take effect on January 4, 2010. As of the effective date, foreigners wishing to visit the U.S., or seeking U.S. residency, will no longer be required to take an AIDS test.

Photo credit: change.gov

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The U.S. Supreme Court has asked the Solicitor General to submit a brief outlining the Obama administration’s stance on an Arizona law that punishes companies for hiring illegal immigrants, the Miami Herald reports. The justices will review this brief before deciding whether to hear a challenge to the law.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On October 28, 2009, President Obama signed into law the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2010 (H.R. 2892). The law contains a measure that ends the “widow penalty,” the government’s practice of annulling a foreigner’s permanent residency application when his or her American spouse dies before the marriage is two years old. 

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

BusinessWeek reports that a troubled economy coupled with domestic concerns about jobs being lost to legal, and illegal, immigrants or through outsourcing make immigration reform a difficult campaign promise for President Obama to keep. Although Obama reaffirmed his commitment to the issue last week while meeting with pro-immigrant activists, his efforts might be stymied by a bill—co-sponsored by his former Illinois colleague, Senator Dick Durbin—that seeks to significantly limit the issuance of H-1B visas. Conversely, legislation that will be unveiled in the upcoming months by Senator Charles Schumer is expected to garner Obama’s support.

The debate comes at a time when immigration is in decline. The number of foreigners immigrating for school or work has decreased, and many presently residing in the U.S. are electing to leave because of a poor job market and visa hassles. As we noted earlier this month, more than one-third of H-1B visas for fiscal year 2009 remain available.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link