Bipartisan Immigration Plan Released Today

By Michelle Valerio

A group of Democrat and Republican senators released the Bipartisan Framework for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, the latest bipartisan effort for comprehensive immigration reform to fix the broken U.S. immigration system. Although the legislation is not drafted yet, the framework of the plan is based on the following four principles:

  1. Providing a path to citizenship for unauthorized individuals currently residing in the United States, contingent upon improving border security and combating visa overstays.
  2. Reforming the immigration system to improve the U.S. economy and strengthen American families.
  3. Creating a mandatory electronic employment verification system – this system would differ from E-Verify, which is mandatory only for federal contractors and in some states.
  4. Improving the process for issuing nonimmigrant work visas (i.e., H-1B, L-1, etc.).

The plan was made public today. The draft legislation is not expected to be unveiled until March, with the expectation that it will be voted on that month. President Obama is scheduled to speak tomorrow in Las Vegas, Nevada, where he is expected to provide a blueprint for his own immigration reform proposal.

House Advances Bill Providing Green Cards to STEM Graduates

 By Ilyse Schuman 

Update: On Nov. 30, 2012, the House passed the
STEM Jobs Act of 2012 by a vote of 245-139.
 

The House of Representatives has decided to revisit a bill that would provide green cards to foreign students who earn certain high-level math and science degrees from U.S. universities. On November 29, the House adopted a resolution that will bring the STEM Jobs Act of 2012 (H.R. 6429) – a measure that would eliminate the diversity lottery green card program and instead redistribute 55,000 green cards to foreign students who graduate from a U.S. university with a Master’s or Ph.D. degree in science (excluding biological and biomedical fields), technology, engineering, or mathematics, the so-called “STEM” fields – to the House floor for a final vote. An earlier version of this bill failed to make headway in September when the House attempted to suspend its normal rules and pass the STEM Jobs Act outright, a procedural maneuver that requires a 2/3 majority vote. The final tally in favor of that measure was 257-158, about 30 votes shy of the amount needed. The House approved the rule to consider the latest STEM bill by a margin of 243-170.

Under the terms of the STEM Jobs Act, which was introduced on September 18, 2012 by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX), the STEM graduates must be petitioned for by an employer who has gone through labor certification to show that there are not sufficient American workers able, willing, qualified and available for the job. The bill also sets forth a number of other requirements for employers, STEM graduates, and universities to participate in this program. The final bill does contain the following changes from the initial legislation:

  • The amended bill allows unused STEM green cards made available in fiscal years 2013 through 2016 to be utilized in future years under conditions set forth in the bill. The introduced bill provided for rollover of STEM green cards made available in 2013 and 2014.
  • The amended version eliminates a provision of the introduced bill requiring STEM green card recipients to promise to work for at least five years in the U.S. or for the petitioner in a STEM field.
  • The final bill eliminates a provision of the introduced bill that had required that in order to be eligible for the STEM green card programs, universities could not provide incentive payments to persons based on securing foreign students.

The House vote on the measure might be held as early as Friday, November 30, 2012.

Despite the bipartisan interest in a STEM visa program and strong support from various business and industry groups, the bill’s elimination of the diversity lottery program remains a strong sticking point with many Democrats. Therefore, even if the House ultimately passes the bill, it is doubtful the Democratically-controlled Senate will consider it during this lame duck session. Moreover, President Obama has issued a Statement of Administration Policy (pdf) that opposes this bill. While the statement claims that the Administration “strongly supports legislation to attract and retain foreign students who graduate with advanced STEM degrees, to establish a start-up visa for foreign-born entrepreneurs to start businesses and create jobs, and to reform the employment-based immigration system to better meet the needs of the U.S. economy,” it emphasizes that “the Administration does not support narrowly tailored proposals that do not meet the President's long-term objectives with respect to comprehensive immigration reform.”

Immigration Reform in 2013

There has been much speculation that comprehensive immigration reform will be an Administration priority in 2013. Therefore, the STEM visa issue will likely reemerge during the next Congressional term, either as a standalone bill or as part of a more comprehensive immigration package. Other STEM-related bills introduced in recent months, for example, would retain the diversity lottery program, and therefore might garner more bipartisan support.

The Attracting the Best and Brightest Act of 2012 (H.R. 6412) introduced by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) on September 14 would create a new visa category (EB-6) that would provide up to 50,000 visas to STEM graduates. Any unused visas granted under the EB-6 category would be reallocated to other employment-based immigrant visa categories. In addition, this bill contains wage protection provisions to ensure that the STEM graduates would not undercut the wages paid to U.S. citizens with comparable levels of experience, and a 2-year sunset provision. This measure would also allow employers to obtain green cards for the students without requiring that they return to their home countries or obtain a temporary visa. With respect to the universities granting the STEM degrees, the Attracting the Best and Brightest Act would exclude for-profit schools from participation.

In the Senate, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on September 19, 2012 introduced the Benefits to Research and American Innovation through Nationality Statutes (BRAINS) Act of 2012 (S. 3553), which would also provide up to 55,000 annual STEM green cards through a 2-year pilot program. The program established under the BRAINS Act shares many of the same requirements as the STEM Jobs Act, but does include certain differences. Some of these differences include the following:

  • STEM students would no longer be required to demonstrate that they have no desire to stay permanently in the U.S. as a precondition to being allowed to attend school in the U.S.
  • Any unused green cards under this program would be reallocated to other employment-based green card programs that are in place for highly-skilled STEM advanced-degree graduates from foreign universities.
  • Temporary workers on high-skilled visas who have not violated their status would be permitted to renew their visas from within the U.S. instead of having to return to their home countries to do so.

Congressional Hispanic Caucus Immigration Reform Principles

Anticipating that immigration reform will likely be addressed in 2013, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) has weighed in with a set of nine principles (pdf) that it believes must be included in any comprehensive measure. According to the CHC, immigration must, among other things, include provisions that accomplish the following:

  • Provide visas for STEM graduates;
  • Establish a workable employment verification system that prevents unlawful employment and rewards employers and employees who play by the rules, while protecting Americans’ right to work and their privacy; and
  • Provide sufficient, safe, and legal avenues for foreign workers to fill legitimate gaps in our workforce, with full labor rights, protection from discrimination, and a reasonable path to permanency that lifts up wages and working conditions for both native and foreign-born workers and their families.

Photo credit: David Franklin

STEM Legislation Stalls in House

By Carol Williams

On Thursday, September 20, 2012, the House failed to pass a bill that would allocate 55,000 green cards per year to those students who graduated from U.S. universities with a Master’s or Doctorate Degree in science, technology, engineering or math (concentrations commonly referred to as STEM occupations). International graduates of U.S. universities in STEM fields have long been sought after by top U.S. employers who find it difficult to fill positions requiring highly technical training. Many employers, as well as numerous technology and business groups, support a path for STEM graduates to maintain lawful immigration status and continue contributing to the U.S. economy.

The rejected bill, Rep. Lamar Smith’s (R-TX) STEM Jobs Act of 2012 (H.R. 6429), would have ended the Diversity Visa Program and taken the 55,000 visas from that program and shifted them to STEM graduates (giving priority to students earning Doctorate degrees). Some opponents of H.R. 6429 argued that it would end an important program allowing immigrants from countries not currently represented in high numbers the opportunity to come to the United States.

The Diversity Visa Program grants green cards to worldwide applicants via lottery. The program targets countries with historically low immigration rates to the United States. For some applicants it is their only option of lawful immigration to the United States. Some members of Congress have cited the Diversity Visa Program as a good foreign diplomacy program and contend that to end it would harm some U.S.-foreign relations.

Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), who opposed Rep. Smith’s bill, authored an alternative bill that also allocated 55,000 green cards per year for STEM graduates. The major difference in Rep. Lofgren’s bill was, rather than ending the Diversity Visa Program, it simply added 55,000 green cards for STEM graduates.

With an ailing economy, some groups oppose any effort to increase immigration sponsorship for international students. These critics cite many U.S. college students graduating unemployed or underemployed, as well as many professionals in STEM careers who are currently looking for employment.

The bills offered by Reps. Smith and Lofgren—as well as yet another bill, sponsored by Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY)—generated a great deal of communication across the aisle. Both Democrats and Republicans have shown an interest in a program to benefit STEM graduates, but the mechanics of such a program have not been worked out yet. Many are hopeful a STEM bill will pass in November, following the presidential election.

House Committee Approves E-2 Visa Legislation for Israeli Investors

By Michelle Valerio

The House Judiciary Committee has approved legislation that would add Israel to the list of countries whose citizens are eligible for an E-2 nonimmigrant treaty investor visa. Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY), Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ) proposed a companion bill in May 2011, but that bill has not yet moved through the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The E-2 visa allows individuals who make a substantial investment in the United States to live in the United States on a temporary basis while they direct the operations of their investment enterprise. Currently, 79 countries have treaties with the United States that allow their citizens to apply for E-2 status.

Israeli nationals are currently eligible for E-1 treaty trader visas based on a separate reciprocal treaty between the United States and Israel. The E-1 visa is a nonimmigrant visa for a foreign national who is coming to the United States to conduct substantial trade between the United States and Israel.

Senate Democrat Says Comprehensive Immigration Reform Not Likely in 2010

Immigration Passport StampSenator Jeff Merkley (D–OR), who has been working with Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) on a comprehensive immigration bill, does not expect action on immigration reform this year, according to The Hill. The senator’s statement exemplifies the on-again, off-again relationship that legislators have with immigration reform. Below is a brief recap of comprehensive immigration reform developments so far in 2010:

  • February: Although immigration reform was a staple of President Obama’s campaign and early-term rhetoric, his State of the Union Address contained only one sentence on the topic.
  • March: Senators Schumer and Lindsey Graham (R–SC) unveiled their “blueprint” for comprehensive reform.
  • April: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–NV) predicted that the issue would not be addressed until after Memorial Day.
  • June: President Obama urged Republicans to work with Democrats to pass a bill.
  • July: In a keynote speech at American University’s School of International Service, President Obama pressed for immigration reform.
  • August: A spokesperson for Senator Dick Durbin (D–IL), who introduced the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act (the "DREAM Act") (pdf), legislation to help students who immigrated to the U.S. as children obtain citizenship, reportedly said that comprehensive immigration reform is still possible in 2010.

Meanwhile, some state and local governments have attempted to fill the void they believe is created by federal inactivity on immigration reform, with Arizona attracting the most attention.

Senators Unveil "Blueprint" for Comprehensive Immigration Reform

Last Thursday, Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) released a framework for comprehensive immigration reform. Although a bill has yet to be introduced, the Senators outlined their “four pillar” reform strategy in a Washington Post opinion column. This plan would include “requiring biometric Social Security cards to ensure that illegal workers cannot get jobs; fulfilling and strengthening our commitments on border security and interior enforcement; creating a process for admitting temporary workers; and implementing a tough but fair path to legalization for those already here.” For more information on this development, please continue reading at Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

Immigration Reform Bill Might Call for Biometric Identification Cards

The Wall Street Journal reports that a mandatory biometric identification card for U.S. citizens and legal residents could be included in a comprehensive immigration reform bill being spearheaded by Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). The card would contain standard identifying information, but would also contain a biometric identifier, e.g., fingerprints. Schumer has previously proposed such a card to replace E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system.

Although the ID card would be required for all workers, including teenagers, implementation would occur in phases, starting with employers in industries that typically rely on illegal immigrant labor. Employers could verify job applicants’ biometric information by acquiring a scanner (costing approximately $800); smaller employers could bring job applicants to a government office for scanning. Workers currently employed would not need to obtain an ID card until they changed jobs.

If an ID card is instituted, the United States would join a host of countries already using biometrics for identification and immigration purposes. For example:

  • the United Arab Emirates requires residency visa holders to provide fingerprints;
  • the United Kingdom fingerprints all foreign nationals entering the country with biometric UK visas, entry clearances and identity cards; and
  • South Africa’s “Events Visa,” which will allow travelers attending the 2010 World Cup access to select African nations in addition to the host country, relies upon biometric verification technology for monitoring travelers’ movements.

Photo credit: Frette

H-1B Visa Remains Hot Topic, Even as Applications Decrease

Even with a considerable decrease in H-1B visa applications during the past year (nearly 20,000 visas remain available for 2009, whereas in 2008 over 163,000 applications were submitted within days of the entry period opening), issues surrounding the H-1B program remain very visible, so much so that Computerworld.com has issued a “10 top H-1B stories” list for fiscal year 2009. The following stories made the list:

  1. The H-1B and L-1 Visa Reform Act of 2009. The bill would limit, to 50%, the percentage of visa holders a company could employ in its U.S. workforce.
  2. Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), chair of the Immigration, Refugees and Border Security subcommittee, is pushing for reform and supports the H-1B program. At a subcommittee hearing, former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan spoke in favor of the H-1B visa.
  3. TARP. Congress placed H-1B restrictions on banks receiving bailout money.
  4. USCIS’s Increased Enforcement Efforts. Reports indicate that 20% of H-1B applications have problems, including fraud.
  5. H-1B and Wages. A New York University / University of Pennsylvania study found evidence that H-1B workers reduced tech wages by as much as 6%.
  6. The Recession. The economic downturn impacted the number of H-1B applications, particularly in the past few months.
  7. Department of Justice Charges. The department filed complaints alleging H-1B fraud against a dozen individuals and companies, which some claim was the largest H-1B enforcement action ever taken by the federal government.
  8. The Obama Administration. The President has appointed many H-1B supporters. Officials include IT industry leaders who benefit from the program and have argued for the end of H-1B visa restrictions.
  9. Legal Challenges. Tech workers challenged President George W. Bush’s decision to extend (from 12 months to 29 months) the duration of student visas, alleging it created a vehicle to side-step H-1B restrictions.
  10. The Shrinking IT Job Market. The H-1B visa program is central to the debate about the effects of globalization on the technology job market.

Obama May Encounter Difficulty Passing Immigration Reform

BusinessWeek reports that a troubled economy coupled with domestic concerns about jobs being lost to legal, and illegal, immigrants or through outsourcing make immigration reform a difficult campaign promise for President Obama to keep. Although Obama reaffirmed his commitment to the issue last week while meeting with pro-immigrant activists, his efforts might be stymied by a bill—co-sponsored by his former Illinois colleague, Senator Dick Durbin—that seeks to significantly limit the issuance of H-1B visas. Conversely, legislation that will be unveiled in the upcoming months by Senator Charles Schumer is expected to garner Obama’s support.

The debate comes at a time when immigration is in decline. The number of foreigners immigrating for school or work has decreased, and many presently residing in the U.S. are electing to leave because of a poor job market and visa hassles. As we noted earlier this month, more than one-third of H-1B visas for fiscal year 2009 remain available.

Comprehensive Immigration Bill in the Works

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) said he expects a comprehensive immigration reform bill to be completed by the end of this year, or early next year. According to Schumer, the bill will focus on increasing the number of highly skilled foreign workers in the U.S. and getting tougher on illegal immigration.

While business seeks to expand the skilled employee pool, particularly in the technology sector, unions have generally been against increased foreign labor. However, AFL-CIO and Change to Win, two prominent unions, came out earlier this year in favor of immigration reform, which they previously opposed. To appeal to both sides, Senator Schumer believes legislators will need to bridge the gap between them. "I think one of the ways to bridge it is to look at the different areas of labor and where there are shortages and where there are not and where just workers are being brought in for exploitive purposes — broadly put meaning just get lower wages — rather than having a shortage," Schumer said.
 

Senate Approves Amendments to Make E-Verify, EB-5 Visa Programs Permanent

Yesterday, the Senate approved by voice vote an amendment (S. AMDT. 1371) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appropriations bill (H.R. 2892) that would make the E-Verify program permanent. Currently a voluntary initiative, E-Verify is an Internet based system operated by DHS in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA) that allows employers to electronically verify the employment eligibility of potential and current employees. The amendment – introduced by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) – requires that all government contractors who do work for the federal government use E-Verify to screen their potential hires. Following introduction of the amendment, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) criticized the E-Verify program, saying that it is a flawed system that “creates havoc for both employers and employees.” Continue reading about this development on Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

Senator Schumer Wants to Replace E-Verify with Biometric Identity Cards

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, has strongly criticized the E-Verify system and proposes replacing it with a biometric-based federal employment verification system. As reported by Workforce Management, Schumer has called E-Verify “unfair” because it singles out individuals with Hispanic surnames and “ineffective” because unauthorized workers can slip through the system by using stolen Social Security numbers and fake IDs.

However, it is far from certain that Schumer’s plan to scrap E-Verify will succeed. The House recently approved a homeland security appropriations bill that includes a two-year reauthorization of E-Verify, and it also has approved redirecting $50 million of the DHS budget to the U.S. Customs and Immigration Services for E-Verify enhancements.

Napolitano to Confer with Lawmakers on Full Range of Immigration Issues

President Barack Obama has asked Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano to meet regularly with members of Congress in order to systematically resolve various immigration issues, including treatment of the 12 million illegal immigrants currently in the country and prevention of illegal immigration going forward. As reported by Reuters, statements by Obama and by various lawmakers emphasize the urgent need to enact immigration reforms soon.

Following a recent meeting with Republican and Democratic lawmakers, Obama told the press, “Despite our inability to get this passed over the last several years, the American people still want to see a solution.” Also following the meeting, Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) stated that Obama has set a goal of passing legislation by the end of 2009 or early 2010. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) stated that, due to the political heat caused by immigration issues, he sees only “one more chance” to enact legislation:

If we can't get it done this time around, no politician is going to take this up in a generation. That would be a shame for this country.

"Forgery-Proof" Worker Identification Card Proposed

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), the new chairman of the immigration subcommittee, strongly supports introducing "forgery-proof" worker identification cards, which would be secured with fingerprints or other biometric data. Schumer, who is heading the Senate’s efforts to draft comprehensive immigration reform legislation, has stated that such an ID card would be the best method of confirming that workers are authorized. As reported in The Los Angeles Times, Schumer is likely to present the worker ID card plan at an upcoming hearing on employee verification systems.

In his book Positively American (published in 2007), Schumer wrote: “The ID will make it easy for employers to avoid undocumented workers, which will allow for tough sanctions against employers who break the law, which will lead to no jobs being available for illegal immigrants, which will stop illegal immigration. …. Once Americans are convinced that we will permanently staunch the flow of illegal immigration, they will be more willing to accept constructing a path toward earned citizenship for those who are already here.”

Although some business and community organizations support the concept of a worker ID card, others argue that the cards would violate privacy rights and civil rights.