Global Immigration Counsel : Immigration Lawyer & Attorney : Littler Mendelson Law Firm : Permanent Residence, Labor Certification : Global Immigration Counsel

Under the H-1B visa program, an employer may employ foreign workers in occupations requiring theoretical or technical expertise in a specialized field. An H-1B visa holder is issued a Social Security number (SSN) but is only authorized to work for his or her sponsoring employer.

In response to a recent Department of Homeland Security (DHS) study and criminal investigations launched by the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning visa fraud, the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) set out to assess whether H-1B workers were properly using their SSNs. In its September 2011 Audit Report, H-1B Workers' Use of Social Security Numbers, the OIG estimated that 18% of H-1B workers assigned a SSN in 2007 may have used their SSN to work for a non-approved employer: specifically, 11% posted wages from an employer other than their approved employer, and 7% posted no wages from fiscal years 2007 to 2009.

Based on its findings, the OIG recommended that the Social Security Administration work more closely with DHS and establish a data match agreement to help DHS identify and reduce improper SSN usage by H-1B visa holders.

Photo credit: Aggressive Entertainment

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has started using a new process for assigning Social Security Numbers (SSNs): randomization. This change is designed to extend the longevity of the nine-digit SSN and enhance identity protection.

Previously, the first three SSN digits (area number) were assigned by state (e.g., 545-573 California; 449-467 Texas; 050-134 New York). However, the state-driven area number assignment had limitations and, with only approximately 420 million available SSNs, the SSA amended the process to extend the longevity of nine-digit SSNs.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A recent report by Reuters highlights the possible correlation between the demand for pilfered identities and employers’ increased efforts to verify employees’ immigration status, e.g., by using E-Verify. Starting in 2009, federal immigration enforcement efforts have targeted employers rather than workers, and many businesses have been intensifying their efforts to ensure the legality of their workforce. The E-Verify program identifies mismatched names and Social Security numbers but is not designed to flag stolen identities. Accordingly, some undocumented workers have moved away from using their real name and an illegitimate Social Security number and, instead, are purchasing and using stolen names and their accompanying Social Security numbers.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has announced that after a four year halt, it will resume sending Social Security “no-match” letters to employers. (SSA has continued to send letters to employees’ home addresses if the name and/or social security number on an employer’s W-2 form does not match the information on SSA’s database.) This new round of no-match letters, formally referred to as “Decentralized Correspondence” (DECOR), informs employers that the information on an employee’s 2010 W-2 wage and tax statement does not match the name and/or Social Security number on file with the SSA, or lacks a SSN entirely. To learn more about this development and its implications for employers, please continue reading at Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On February 14, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) re-introduced the “Strengthening Our Commitment to Legal Immigration and America’s Security Act” (S. 332). Senator Hatch first introduced this bill on September 29, 2010, but it died in committee. The current bill has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. As outlined in our report of the bill’s initial introduction, Senator Hatch’s bill includes a long list of immigration enforcement provisions, such as requiring the IRS to notify Social Security number holders if the agency suspects fraudulent use of their number for employment verification purposes.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On September 29, 2010, Senator Orrin Hatch (R–UT) introduced the “Strengthening Our Commitment to Legal Immigration and America’s Security Act” (S.3901) (pdf). The bill is the third notable piece of immigration legislation introduced last week, together with the comprehensive immigration reform bill introduced by Senators Menendez and Leahy, and Senator Chambliss’ HARVEST Act (relating to agricultural workers). Senator Hatch’s bill addresses numerous immigration enforcement topics, and notable provisions include:

• Illegal aliens could only be paroled or granted deferred action on a case-by-case basis (for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit). Mass paroles and deferrals would be prohibited.
• Any state, county, city, or township that is eligible to participate in the Secure Communities program or to cross-designate local law enforcement officers to perform immigration law enforcement functions under section 287(g) (pdf) and does not participate in such programs may not receive compensation for incarceration expenses of illegal aliens.
• Individuals known or reasonably believed to be members of a known criminal organization regularly engaged in transnational criminal activity would be ineligible for visas.
• Elimination of the Diversity Visa Program, unless Congress signs off on changes designed to combat fraud and eliminate abuse in the program.
• Annual reporting by the Secretary of Health and Human Services on welfare benefits provided to states, and the portion thereof provided to illegal immigrants.
• Limiting states’ expansion of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) coverage to noncitizen children or noncitizen pregnant women.
• Requiring the IRS to notify Social Security number holders if the agency suspects fraudulent use of their number for employment verification purposes.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On September 29, 2010, Senators Robert Menendez (D–NJ) and Patrick Leahy (D–VT) introduced “The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2010” (S. 3932). According to Senator Menendez, the bill “addresses long-standing, wide-ranging flaws in the immigration system that have been priorities of groups on each side of the immigration reform debate.” The bill was introduced shortly before Congress adjourned for its mid-term election recess. As reported by The Hill, Senator Menendez defended his timing for introducing the bill by stating that it could lead to possible “lame-duck movement” on the legislation, and in the longer term it serves as an "invitation to bring Republican colleagues to discussion" on immigration reform.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Proposed legislation in Pennsylvania and New Jersey would impose stricter work authorization verification requirements on employers.

Pennsylvania

House Bill 1502 would require all contractors and subcontractors on public works projects to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. In June 2010, this bill was referred to the House State Government Committee.

House Bill 1503 would require all construction industry employers to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. This bill was passed by the House in June 2010 and is currently in the Senate Labor and Industry Committee.

Employers that in good faith rely on federal programs (E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service) to verify new employees’ legal work status and existing employees’ Social Security numbers will be immune from sanctions. However, employers face debarment from public work contracts (HB 1502) or license forfeiture (HB 1503) for noncompliance. Additionally, employers could face civil liability for retaliating against employees who complain about alleged violations or participate in investigations, hearing or inquiries concerning alleged violations.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Coastal Steel and Acoustics became the first company in South Carolina to sign an IMAGE agreement (Immigration and Customs Enforcement Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers), the agency announced. By signing the agreement, the company:

• will receive agency-provided training and education on fraudulent document detection, as well as on proper hiring and anti-discrimination procedures;
• can use E-Verify, the federal electronic employee verification system, and the Social Security Number Verification Service; and
• can become “IMAGE certified” by following the Department of Homeland Security’s Best Employment Practices.

IMAGE was initiated in 2007 to combat unlawful employment and reduce vulnerabilities that help illegal immigrants gain employment in the United States.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Last Thursday, Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) released a framework for comprehensive immigration reform. Although a bill has yet to be introduced, the Senators outlined their “four pillar” reform strategy in a Washington Post opinion column. This plan would include “requiring biometric Social Security cards to ensure that illegal workers cannot get jobs; fulfilling and strengthening our commitments on border security and interior enforcement; creating a process for admitting temporary workers; and implementing a tough but fair path to legalization for those already here.” For more information on this development, please continue reading at Littler's Washington D.C. Employment Law Update blog.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, has strongly criticized the E-Verify system and proposes replacing it with a biometric-based federal employment verification system. As reported by Workforce Management, Schumer has called E-Verify “unfair” because it singles out individuals with Hispanic surnames and “ineffective” because unauthorized workers can slip through the system by using stolen Social Security numbers and fake IDs.

However, it is far from certain that Schumer’s plan to scrap E-Verify will succeed. The House recently approved a homeland security appropriations bill that includes a two-year reauthorization of E-Verify, and it also has approved redirecting $50 million of the DHS budget to the U.S. Customs and Immigration Services for E-Verify enhancements.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Representatives Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) and Sam Johnson (R-TX) have introduced a bill that would establish a mandatory electronic verification system to take the place of E-Verify. As reported at Workforce.com, Giffords and Johnson hope their bill, the New Employee Verification Act, will either be the foundation for employment verification in a broader immigration bill or move through Congress on its own.

The proposed legislation would:

• Require all employers to use either the Electronic Employment Verification System (based on the new-hire system used to enforce child support payments) or the Secure Electronic Employment Verification System (which would authenticate an employee’s identity using biometric information). Data for recently hired employees would be checked against Social Security and Department of Homeland Security databases to determine work eligibility.
• Eliminate the I-9 immigration form.
• Establish civil and criminal penalties for employers that knowingly hire illegal immigrants.
• Establish federal preemption of state laws on employment verification.
• Require that the Social Security database, which has a 4.1% error rate, be cleaned up before the new system takes effect.

Giffords and Johnson have collaborated on the legislation with The HR Initiative for a Legal Workforce, which is led by the Society for Human Resource Management.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Arkansas Democrat Gazette reports that Arkansas state representative Bill Sample plans to introduce a bill requiring, in part, verification of Social Security numbers prior to the issuance of employee identification cards. Rep. Sample made the following comments about the bill:

It will establish proper guidelines for the issuance of identification cards and documents. ... We're trying to define who can give out identification cards and what those ID cards would state. We don't want those phony ID cards to go out. ... If you give them an ID card, you're responsible to do a little due diligence and make sure that person is in the state legally.

• Email This
• Print
• Trackbacks
• Share Link