Bill Would Significantly Increase Employer Penalties for Hiring Illegal Workers
.jpg)
Rep. Sue Wilkins Myrick (R-NC) has reintroduced legislation that would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to substantially increase employer penalties for violations. The 10k Run for the Border Act (H.R. 1698) would increase the fines for knowingly hiring or recruiting an undocumented worker, or continuing to employ an illegal alien when the employee’s legal status changes or becomes known.
Under the terms of this bill, an employer could be fined between $10,000 and $80,000 for each violation, an increase from the current $250-$2,000 penalty range. For an employer with a prior violation, the penalties would be increased to between $80,000 and $200,000, up from $2,000 to $5,000 per violation under current law. For a repeat offender, the fine skyrockets to a range of $120,000 to $1.6 million. The current fine for such a repeat offense is a minimum penalty of $3,000 and a maximum of $10,000.
If state or local law enforcement officials provide material assistance in investigating or prosecuting employers that are in violation of this law, they are entitled to 80 percent of the fines paid by those employers. It follows that such large financial incentives would increase enforcement.
The provisions of this amendment would take effect on the day of enactment. Prior versions of this bill have been introduced within the past six years, but have failed to advance.
Photo credit: Kameleon007
The Supreme Court has held that an Arizona law that imposes sanctions on employers that hire unauthorized workers and requires the mandatory use of E-Verify is not preempted by federal law, and therefore valid. The Arizona law at issue – the Legal Arizona Workers Act – provides for the suspension or revocation of an employer’s business license in that state if that employer knowingly or intentionally hires an unauthorized worker. The statute also mandates the use of the E-Verify electronic verification system to check on an employee’s work eligibility. The Court’s decision in Chamber Of Commerce v. Whiting upholding this statute opens the door for other states to enact laws that similarly impose stricter penalties on employers for immigration law violations. To learn more about the decision, please 
Arizona legislators continue to press forward with immigration-related proposals. State Senate President Russell Pearce, sponsor of the infamous .jpg){kind=small}
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has 
The Fresno Bee 
House Bill 1502 would require all contractors and subcontractors on public works projects to verify the employment eligibility of new employees through E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, and to verify existing employees’ Social Security numbers. In June 2010, this bill was referred to the House State Government Committee.
New Jersey has also introduced two bills, 
Employers using E-Verify to authenticate employees’ work authorization status are subject to the Three-Day Rule, which requires an employer to create an E-Verify case no later than three business days after an employee first works for pay (commonly referred to as the Hire Date). Confusion sometimes arises, however, because the Hire Date differs depending on whether the E-Verify case is created before or after the first day an employee works for pay. To clarify the matter, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) created a .jpg){kind=small}
According to the 
Audits, not raids, are the centerpiece of the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement strategy, 
The New York Times .jpg)
With many in the nation watching, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed the "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act" ("SB 1070") into law. The legislation represents Arizona's latest effort to combat illegal immigration and is now the centerpiece of a national political firestorm, including criticism from President Obama and numerous public interest groups. In addition, SB 1070 already is the subject of two federal lawsuits challenging its constitutionality. Lost among this debate, however, are those provisions of the law directed toward Arizona employers. To learn more about the law and its implications for employers, please continue reading Littler's ASAP .jpg)
As this blog .jpg)
Gulfnews.com .gif){kind=small}
Businesses in the southern California city of Lancaster will be required to use E-Verify to confirm new hires’ eligibility to legally work in the United States, according to the 
