Some Businesses Are Reluctant to Use E-Verify

Posted on November 24, 2010 by Immigration/Global Migration Group

The Fresno Bee reports that some employers, particularly within the agriculture industry, will not use E-Verify, the federal electronic employment verification system, to authenticate new hires’ legal work status. Relying on figures provided by the federal government, the paper states that “[o]ut of thousands of businesses in Fresno, for example, only 179 use the program… although those numbers don't account for businesses that contract with personnel companies using the program.” Businesses cite two main reasons for their non-participation in E-Verify: (1) administrative burden; and (2) a shortage of available legal workers.

Administrative Burden

Businesses unwilling to use E-Verify often point to the associated administrative burden. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which runs E-Verify, acknowledges that simply preparing to use E-Verify requires between a few days to several months, depending on a business’s size and processes. Human resources staff must devote time to enrolling in the program, and learning how to use it (via DHS manuals or online tutorials). Conducting the verification process and addressing issues that arise if E-Verify finds an individual ineligible to work requires time and resources.

However, the risks of noncompliance are significant. As previously reported here, the current administration’s approach to immigration enforcement centers upon employer audits. In April 2009, DHS issued a fact sheet, which revised its Worksite Enforcement Strategy to strengthen its focus on employer noncompliance. Two months later, 652 businesses received Notices of Inspections from Immigration and Customs Enforcement; at the end of the year, in December 2009, 1,000 faced audits, and the trend continues in 2010. From October 2009 to July 2010, businesses in Texas alone were fined over $600,000.

Also, although federal law makes E-Verify mandatory only for federal contractors, an increasing number of state and local governments have passed laws mandating the use of E-Verify. These laws typically apply only to public employers and contractors, but some states and municipalities require private employers to use E-Verify. In certain states and municipalities with proposed or actual immigration-related laws, use of E-Verify benefits employers because it provides a good faith defense to hiring violations.

The Legal Workforce

The lack of an available and willing legal workforce is another justification companies put forth for not using E-Verify. As an agricultural employer told The Fresno Bee, “[E-Verify] may work for Costco, but Costco doesn't have the problem I have,” i.e., a legal workforce shortage. The United Farm Workers of America, a large agricultural workers union, recently ran a campaign called “Take Our Jobs” that challenged individuals with legal U.S. work status to take illegal immigrants’ positions working in the fields. As noted by The Hill, only seven individuals accepted the challenge, the most notable being Stephen Colbert of Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report,” who testified (in character) about his experience before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law.

Farmers interviewed by The Fresno Bee stated their preference for a legal workforce, and some pending bills aim for this result. In October 2010, Senator Saxby Chambliss introduced a bill (S. 3912) that aims to provide a non-amnesty option for temporary agricultural workers and streamline the H-2A temporary worker program. The Menendez-Leahy comprehensive immigration reform bill seeks, among other things, to address shortcomings in existing worker programs that have led to undocumented migration.

Employers or individuals wanting to learn more about E-Verify can read Littler’s Insight, A Basic Guide to E-Verify and Related Immigration Compliance: Everything Federal Contractors and Others Need to Know to Comply with E-Verify Requirements, this blog’s E-Verify entries, or visit the DHS E-Verify page.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • Email This
  • Print
  • Trackbacks
  • Share Link

Obama Administration's Immigration Enforcement Strategy: Audits

Posted on July 15, 2010 by Immigration/Global Migration Group

Binders and Magnifying GlassAudits, not raids, are the centerpiece of the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement strategy, reports the New York Times. In the past year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) audited over 2,900 business to determine whether illegal immigrants were employed, and, in 2010, it imposed $3 million in civil fines. While audits are less visually dramatic than raids, the effects on workers and businesses are not.

If an audit reveals that a business employs illegal workers, the employer must fire those employees or face criminal charges. For employers in migrant-driven industries, audits significantly and immediately deplete their workforces, making it difficult to conduct business. For dismissed employees, finding work in local or surrounding areas is difficult because potential employers fear being audited themselves.

Though ICE officials contend the audits’ targets are egregious labor and immigration law violators, some contend that the agency is missing its mark by going after employee-friendly businesses. Others, however, contend that the agency’s efforts are insufficient because employees found to be illegal immigrants are being fired instead of being arrested and deported.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • Email This
  • Print
  • Trackbacks
  • Share Link

Homeland Security Issues Fact Sheet on Worksite Enforcement Strategy

Posted on May 4, 2009 by Immigration/Global Migration Group

On April 30, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a Fact Sheet discussing its revised Worksite Enforcement Strategy. The DHS enforcement strategy was revised at the direction of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano after she expressed concerns that enforcement efforts were targeted more at employees rather than employers abusing the law. Indeed, the Fact Sheet acknowledges that there were more than 6,000 arrests related to worksite enforcement in 2008, but only 135 employers were arrested.

The revised strategy "reflects a renewed Department-wide focus targeting criminal aliens and employers who cultivate illegal workplaces by . . . knowingly hiring illegal workers." Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is to focus its resources on the criminal prosecution of employers that knowingly hire illegal workers, but will continue to arrest and prosecute illegal workers found during the course of worksite enforcement actions. ICE will also use all available civil and administrative tools, including fines and debarment, to deter illegal employment.

The Fact Sheet indicates that ICE will look for evidence of mistreatment of workers in addition to evidence indicating criminal conduct such as trafficking, smuggling, harboring, visa fraud, identification document fraud, or money laundering. Before conducting a raid and arresting workers at the site of employment, ICE will obtain indictments, criminal arrest or search warrants, or a commitment from the US Attorney's office to prosecute the employer. The existing humanitarian guidelines governing ICE’s behavior in raids affecting 150 or more employees will now apply to worksite enforcement efforts impacting 25 or more illegal workers.

The revised enforcement strategy suggests that there will be increased criminal enforcement efforts and interagency cooperative investigations. It is likely that ICE will continue the growing trend of planting agents within the employer's workforce to gather evidence of criminal activity. Going forward, it is almost a certainty that enforcement efforts will begin with an audit of I-9 compliance, particularly for employers in industries with high percentages of illegal workers, as well as for employers engaged in infrastructure projects. A recent Congressional Research Service report (PDF) analyzing unauthorized employment in the U.S. listed the following industries as having significant (over 10%) employment of illegal workers: Food Manufacturing, Agriculture, Furniture Manufacturing, Construction, Textiles and Apparel, Food Services, Administrative and Support Services, and Accommodation. Employers in these industries should review their I-9 compliance and adopt best practices to avoid adverse consequences related to employment of unauthorized workers.

This entry was authored by David Whitlock.
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
  • Email This
  • Print
  • Trackbacks
  • Share Link